Literature DB >> 8430008

Repeated visual acuity measurement: establishing the patient's own criterion for change.

B Brown1, J Lovie-Kitchin.   

Abstract

We measured visual acuity in 10 young subjects, 10 times each over a period of approximately 3 weeks, using Bailey-Lovie charts. We used a consistent end-point criterion and scored each letter read on the chart. We derived the mean and standard deviation of visual acuity measures for each subject, and for the group. The standard deviation for the group was about 3 times that of the individuals in the group. We calculated the criterion for reduction of visual acuity for the group, as group mean plus 1.96 group standard deviations; use of this criterion would consistently fail to detect patients with clinically significant reductions in visual acuity. We recommend that visual acuity be measured to threshold for every patient. Measuring visual acuity between three and five times provides an estimate of the patient's variability and allows a criterion for reduction of visual acuity to be established for the individual patient. Use of this criterion will enhance the sensitivity of visual acuity measurement as a diagnostic tool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8430008     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199301000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  7 in total

1.  Vision test variability in retinitis pigmentosa and psychosocial factors.

Authors:  Ava K Bittner; Mohamed A Ibrahim; Jennifer A Haythornthwaite; Marie Diener-West; Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  A comparison of functional and structural measures for identifying progression of glaucoma.

Authors:  Daiyan Xin; Vivienne C Greenstein; Robert Ritch; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Carlos Gustavo De Moraes; Donald C Hood
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Sensitivity and specificity of the step VEP in suspected functional visual acuity loss.

Authors:  Ruth Hamilton; Michael S Bradnam; Gordon N Dutton; Anna L Lai Chooi Yan; Tim E Lavy; I Livingstone; Alison M Mackay; Jane R Mackinnon
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Intervisit variability of visual parameters in Leber congenital amaurosis caused by RPE65 mutations.

Authors:  Alejandro J Roman; Artur V Cideciyan; Sharon B Schwartz; Melani B Olivares; Elise Heon; Samuel G Jacobson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  A standardized logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity chart in Hindi.

Authors:  Ananth Sailoganathan; Ebi Peter Osuobeni; John Siderov
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  Age-Related Differences in Spatial Frequency Processing during Scene Categorization.

Authors:  Stephen Ramanoël; Louise Kauffmann; Emilie Cousin; Michel Dojat; Carole Peyrin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A new Gujarati language logMAR visual acuity chart: development and validation.

Authors:  Ananth Sailoganathan; John Siderov; Ebi Osuobeni
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.848

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.