Literature DB >> 8428174

Enhancing mammography uptake: who do women listen to?

F Kee1, A M Telford, P Donaghy, A O'Doherty.   

Abstract

Previous work has established that women who attend for mammography differ from non-attenders in a number of socio-demographic and attitudinal characteristics. The present study was conducted to determine whether women who attended for mammography differed from non-attenders in a number of key areas: (1) in how they obtained information about screening; (2) in their understanding of the disease and basic screening precepts; and (3) in the extent to which they perceived their general practitioners (GPs) and other members of the primary case team, such as practice nurses, had actively promoted the programme. Three hundred attenders and 300 non-attenders were interviewed in their own homes using a structured questionnaire. Only 5% of women interviewed had ever asked their GP for any advice about breast screening, and only 18% recalled their family doctor every discussing or raising the subject with them. Although attenders and non-attenders differed significantly in their understanding of the scope and purpose of screening, both groups obtained information more often from friends and relatives and broadcast media than from official sources. Attenders were more likely to cite material in the GP's surgery as an important source of information (chi 2 = 5.1, p = 0.02). Attenders were marginally more likely than non-attenders to have previously attended a well-woman clinic in primary care (chi 2 = 3.1, p = 0.08) and were more likely to say that such clinics were being offered by their family doctor (chi 2 = 9.8, p = 0.008).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8428174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 0959-8278            Impact factor:   2.497


  3 in total

1.  What general practitioners should do about breast screening.

Authors:  P A Creighton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-01-28

2.  Factors associated with attendance at screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca Mottram; Wendy Lynn Knerr; Daniel Gallacher; Hannah Fraser; Lena Al-Khudairy; Abimbola Ayorinde; Sian Williamson; Chidozie Nduka; Olalekan A Uthman; Samantha Johnson; Alexander Tsertsvadze; Christopher Stinton; Sian Taylor-Phillips; Aileen Clarke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Intermittent attendance at breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Padraic Fleming; Sinead O'Neill; Miriam Owens; Therese Mooney; Patricia Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Public Health Res       Date:  2013-09-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.