Literature DB >> 8427439

Two-thumb versus two-finger chest compression during CRP in a swine infant model of cardiac arrest.

J J Menegazzi1, T E Auble, K A Nicklas, G M Hosack, L Rack, J S Goode.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that two-thumb chest compression generates higher arterial and coronary perfusion pressures than the current American Heart Association-approved two-finger method.
DESIGN: Randomized, crossover experimental trial. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Animal laboratory experiment with seven swine of either sex weighing 9.4 kg (SD, 0.8 kg), representing infants less than 1 year old.
INTERVENTIONS: Animals were sedated with IM ketamine/xylazine, intubated with a 6.0 Hi-Lo endotracheal tube, anesthetized with alpha-chloralose, and paralyzed with pancuronium. ECG was monitored continuously. Left femoral arterial and Swan-Ganz catheters were placed. Cardiac arrest was induced with an IV bolus of KCl and verified by ECG and pressure tracings. Five American Heart Association-certified basic rescuers were randomly assigned to perform external chest compressions for one minute by either the currently recommended two-finger method or the two-thumb and thorax-squeeze method. After all five completed their first trial, rescuers crossed over to the other method for a second minute of compressions. Ventilation was performed with a bag-valve device, and no drugs were given during CPR. After three complete cycles, the fourth through sixth cycles of compressions were recorded. Every compression was analyzed for arterial systolic, diastolic, mean, and coronary perfusion pressures. One thousand fifty compressions were analyzed with repeated-measures analysis of variance and Scheffé multiple comparisons.
RESULTS: Systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and coronary perfusion pressure were all significantly higher (P < .001) with the two-thumb thoracic squeeze technique: systolic blood pressure, 59.4 versus 41.6 mm Hg; diastolic blood pressure, 21.8 versus 18.5 mm Hg; mean arterial pressure, 34.2 versus 26.1 mm Hg; and coronary perfusion pressure, 15.1 versus 12.2 mm Hg.
CONCLUSION: The two-thumb method of chest compression generates significantly higher arterial and coronary perfusion pressures than the two-finger method in this infant model of cardiac arrest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8427439     DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)80212-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  16 in total

1.  Singapore Neonatal Resuscitation Guidelines 2016.

Authors:  Cheo Lian Yeo; Agnihotri Biswas; Teong Tai Kenny Ee; Amutha Chinnadurai; Vijayendra Ranjan Baral; Alvin Shang Ming Chang; Imelda Lustestica Ereno; Kah Ying Selina Ho; Woei Bing Poon; Varsha Atul Shah; Bin Huey Quek
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.858

Review 2.  Part 13: pediatric basic life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

Authors:  Marc D Berg; Stephen M Schexnayder; Leon Chameides; Mark Terry; Aaron Donoghue; Robert W Hickey; Robert A Berg; Robert M Sutton; Mary Fran Hazinski
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Pediatric basic life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

Authors:  Marc D Berg; Stephen M Schexnayder; Leon Chameides; Mark Terry; Aaron Donoghue; Robert W Hickey; Robert A Berg; Robert M Sutton; Mary Fran Hazinski
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Better outcome after pediatric resuscitation is still a dilemma.

Authors:  Sandeep Sahu; Kamal Kishore; Indu Lata
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2010-07

5.  Neonatal resuscitation: Current issues.

Authors:  Indu A Chadha
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2010-09

6.  Effect of alternative chest compression techniques in infant and child on rescuer performance.

Authors:  Jai P Udassi; Sharda Udassi; Douglas W Theriaque; Jonathan J Shuster; Arno L Zaritsky; Ikram U Haque
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.624

7.  Which Fingers Should We Perform Two-Finger Chest Compression Technique with When Performing Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation on an Infant in Cardiac Arrest?

Authors:  Young Sinn Kim; Je Hyeok Oh; Chan Woong Kim; Sung Eun Kim; Dong Hoon Lee; Jun Young Hong
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Clinical practice: neonatal resuscitation. A Dutch consensus.

Authors:  Frank A M van den Dungen; Mariëtte B van Veenendaal; A L M Mulder
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 9.  [Newborn resuscitation and support of transition of infants at birth].

Authors:  John Madar; Charles C Roehr; Sean Ainsworth; Hege Ersda; Colin Morley; Mario Rüdiger; Christiane Skåre; Tomasz Szczapa; Arjan Te Pas; Daniele Trevisanuto; Berndt Urlesberger; Dominic Wilkinson; Jonathan P Wyllie
Journal:  Notf Rett Med       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 0.892

10.  Part 5. Pediatric basic life support: 2015 Korean Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

Authors:  Ji Sook Lee; Ji Yun Ahn; Do Kyun Kim; Yoon Hee Kim; Bongjin Lee; Won Kyoung Jhang; Gi Beom Kim; Jin-Tae Kim; June Huh; June Dong Park; Sung Phil Chung; Sung Oh Hwang
Journal:  Clin Exp Emerg Med       Date:  2016-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.