OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine relationships between sociodemographic indicators of risk and depression symptoms within the Black and White populations. METHODS: In a national probability sample, differences in sex, age, marital status, religion, social class, employment status, urbanicity, and region were evaluated against a Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale score of 16 or greater. Risk factors were identified within the two populations and compared between them. RESULTS: For both races, females were at greater risk for depression than males, and respondents who were formerly married or separated were at greater risk than those who were currently married. Major differences in patterns of risk were also found between the races. Blacks who were 30 to 39 years of age, belonged to non-Western religious groups, and lived in the West were at greater risk than comparable Whites. Blacks who were widowed, members of the middle and lower-middle class, and unemployed were at less risk. CONCLUSIONS: Similarities and differences in patterns of risk were evident. The nature of the differences suggests important divergence in sociocultural and economic experience.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine relationships between sociodemographic indicators of risk and depression symptoms within the Black and White populations. METHODS: In a national probability sample, differences in sex, age, marital status, religion, social class, employment status, urbanicity, and region were evaluated against a Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale score of 16 or greater. Risk factors were identified within the two populations and compared between them. RESULTS: For both races, females were at greater risk for depression than males, and respondents who were formerly married or separated were at greater risk than those who were currently married. Major differences in patterns of risk were also found between the races. Blacks who were 30 to 39 years of age, belonged to non-Western religious groups, and lived in the West were at greater risk than comparable Whites. Blacks who were widowed, members of the middle and lower-middle class, and unemployed were at less risk. CONCLUSIONS: Similarities and differences in patterns of risk were evident. The nature of the differences suggests important divergence in sociocultural and economic experience.
Authors: Joyce T Bromberger; Laura L Schott; Howard M Kravitz; Maryfran Sowers; Nancy E Avis; Ellen B Gold; John F Randolph; Karen A Matthews Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2010-06
Authors: Wendy K Marsh; Joyce T Bromberger; Sybil L Crawford; Katherine Leung; Howard M Kravitz; John F Randolph; Hadine Joffe; Claudio N Soares Journal: Menopause Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Joyce T Bromberger; Laura L Schott; Nancy E Avis; Sybil L Crawford; Sioban D Harlow; Hadine Joffe; Howard M Kravitz; Karen A Matthews Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Teresa Lanza di Scalea; Karen A Matthews; Nancy E Avis; Rebecca C Thurston; Charlotte Brown; Sioban Harlow; Joyce T Bromberger Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2012-02-23 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Joyce T Bromberger; Laura L Schott; Karen A Matthews; Howard M Kravitz; Siobán D Harlow; Jennifer Karas Montez Journal: Arch Womens Ment Health Date: 2017-06-28 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Ghasi S Phillips; Lauren A Wise; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Meir J Stampfer; Lynn Rosenberg Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 3.797