Literature DB >> 8427139

The angle of incidence of the ultrasonic beam: a critical factor for the image quality in intravascular ultrasonography.

C Di Mario1, S Madretsma, D Linker, S H The, N Bom, P W Serruys, E J Gussenhoven, J R Roelandt.   

Abstract

The effects of the angle of incidence of the ultrasound beam on the image quality were studied in 21 pressurized arterial specimens examined with a 30 MHz intravascular ultrasonographic catheter. When the ultrasonographic catheter was in an eccentric position in the vessel lumen, the videodensity of the segments of the vessel wall with the least favorable angle of interrogation (a shift of 49 +/- 6 degrees from the tangent to the tissue surface) was 27% +/- 19% lower than the videodensity measured with the catheter in the center of the lumen. When the catheter was placed in a position that was not parallel to the long axis of the vessel, a further decrease was observed, especially in the vessel wall opposite the position of the catheter. An artificial dissection was induced in eight specimens. Dropouts that involved the dissection plane and the underlying structures were produced with positions of the echographic catheter inducing a narrow angle between ultrasound beam and dissection plane. These experimentally induced artifacts were compared with similar findings from the in vivo evaluation of peripheral and coronary arteries. The angle of incidence of the ultrasound beam is a major determinant of the image quality in intravascular ultrasonography. Angle-dependent artifacts occur with eccentric and noncoaxial positions of the ultrasonographic catheter and, in particular, with imaging of large intraluminal dissections. Awareness of this problem may prevent image misinterpretation and has relevance for future improvement of catheter technology and design.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8427139     DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(93)90024-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  5 in total

1.  Factors influencing the intravascular ultrasound dimensions and areas measured using mechanical transducers.

Authors:  V Bhargava; W F Penny; A Arbab-Zadeh
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1996-12

2.  Three dimensional reconstruction of cross sectional intracoronary ultrasound: clinical or research tool?

Authors:  C Di Mario; C von Birgelen; F Prati; B Soni; W Li; N Bruining; P P de Jaegere; P J de Feyter; P W Serruys; J R Roelandt
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-05

Review 3.  Intracoronary ultrasound: current state of the art.

Authors:  P P Kearney; I R Starkey; G R Sutherland
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-05

4.  Percutaneous transvenous intracardiac ultrasound imaging in dogs: a new approach to monitor left ventricular function.

Authors:  L Jiang; N J Weissman; J L Guerrero; J He; A E Weyman; R A Levine; M H Picard
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Hemodynamic changes lead to alterations in aortic diameters and may challenge further stent graft sizing in acute aortic syndrome.

Authors:  Julia Lortz; Konstantinos Tsagakis; Christos Rammos; Alexander Lind; Thomas Schlosser; Heinz Jakob; Tienush Rassaf; Rolf Alexander Jánosi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.