Literature DB >> 8426975

Women's views of ultrasonography. A comparison of women's experiences of antenatal ultrasound screening with cerebral ultrasound of their newborn infant.

K Thorpe1, L Harker, A Pike, N Marlow.   

Abstract

Ultrasound screening is now a routine procedure which forms part of antenatal care provision. Within this routine context ultrasound technology has been found to be generally acceptable and indeed is positively demanded by many women. This paper raises the question whether the routine presentation of ultrasound implicitly conveys the message that its use in antenatal care is both valuable and safe. It examines women's views of ultrasound technology beyond a routine context. In study designed to examine women's reactions to cerebral ultrasound on their normal term infants mothers were asked their views and knowledge of ultrasound and a comparison with their antenatal experience of ultrasound was elicited. A generalized concern about ultrasound techniques was found to underlie many of the women's comments. This raised questions concerning the current practice in the presentation of ultrasound to women attending for antenatal care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8426975     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90015-v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  4 in total

1.  Syrian women's perceptions and experiences of ultrasound screening in pregnancy: implications for antenatal policy.

Authors:  Hyam Bashour; Raghda Hafez; Asmaa Abdulsalam
Journal:  Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2005-05

2.  Evaluating the impact of a mandatory pre-abortion ultrasound viewing law: A mixed methods study.

Authors:  Ushma D Upadhyay; Katrina Kimport; Elise K O Belusa; Nicole E Johns; Douglas W Laube; Sarah C M Roberts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  First and second trimester ultrasound in pregnancy: A systematic review and metasynthesis of the views and experiences of pregnant women, partners, and health workers.

Authors:  Gill Moncrieff; Kenneth Finlayson; Sarah Cordey; Rebekah McCrimmon; Catherine Harris; Maria Barreix; Özge Tunçalp; Soo Downe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Womens' opinions on antenatal care in developing countries: results of a study in Cuba, Thailand, Saudi Arabia and Argentina.

Authors:  Gustavo Nigenda; Ana Langer; Chusri Kuchaisit; Mariana Romero; Georgina Rojas; Muneera Al-Osimy; José Villar; Jo Garcia; Yagob Al-Mazrou; Hassan Ba'aqeel; Guillermo Carroli; Ubaldo Farnot; Pisake Lumbiganon; José Belizán; Per Bergsjo; Leiv Bakketeig; Gunilla Lindmark
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2003-05-20       Impact factor: 3.295

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.