Literature DB >> 8426831

Patterns of use of obstetrical interventions in 12 countries.

P A Stephenson1, C Bakoula, E Hemminki, L Knudsen, M Levasseur, J Schenker, Z Stembera, J Tiba, H P Verbrugge, J Zupan.   

Abstract

Recent obstetrical practice trends in 12 countries were surveyed. There was a 3-fold difference in caesarean section rates and a 10-fold difference in instrumental vaginal delivery rates among countries. There was a net increase in the caesarean section rate of all countries over the study period and a net decrease in the instrumental vaginal delivery rate of some countries. There was a decrease in the caesarean section rate during the last year of observation in Australia, Denmark and Finland. In general, countries with high caesarean rates also had high instrumental vaginal delivery rates. There was no consistent relationship between use of caesarean section and use of instrumental vaginal delivery, although in several countries increasing use of caesarean section was accompanied by decreasing use of instrumental vaginal delivery. Oxytocin use rates were associated positively with instrumental delivery but not with caesarean section rates. While it was not possible to determine the proportions of women who received appropriate obstetrical care, we can infer that a significant proportion of interventions were unnecessary or only marginally beneficial. Continued increases in rates of obstetrical intervention are unlikely to result in improvements in birth outcome overall and may pose a risk to mothers and their newborns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8426831     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.1993.tb00600.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol        ISSN: 0269-5022            Impact factor:   3.980


  8 in total

1.  Inter-hospital variations in caesarean sections. A risk adjusted comparison in the Valencia public hospitals.

Authors:  J Librero; S Peiró; S M Calderón
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  How effective is amniotomy as a means of induction of labour?

Authors:  S M Cooley; M P Geary; M P O'Connell; K McQuillan; P McParland; D Keane
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term.

Authors:  Shiliang Liu; Robert M Liston; K S Joseph; Maureen Heaman; Reg Sauve; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Rates for obstetric intervention among private and public patients in Australia: population based descriptive study.

Authors:  C L Roberts; S Tracy; B Peat
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-07-15

Review 5.  Caesarean sections and for-profit status of hospitals: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Lamprini Syrogiannouli; Xhyljeta Luta; Kali Tal; David C Goodman; Bruno R da Costa; Peter Jüni
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Variations in childbirth interventions in high-income countries: protocol for a multinational cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Anna Seijmonsbergen-Schermers; Thomas van den Akker; Katrien Beeckman; Annick Bogaerts; Monalisa Barros; Patricia Janssen; Lorena Binfa; Eva Rydahl; Lucy Frith; Mechthild M Gross; Berglind Hálfdánsdóttir; Deirdre Daly; Jean Calleja-Agius; Patricia Gillen; Anne Britt Vika Nilsen; Eugene Declercq; Ank de Jonge
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Caesarean sections and private insurance: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Lamprini Syrogiannouli; Medina Braha; David C Goodman; Bruno R da Costa; Peter Jüni
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  The incidence of caesarean sections in the university clinical center of kosovo.

Authors:  Brikene Elshani; Armond Daci; Sanije Gashi; Shefqet Lulaj
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2012-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.