Literature DB >> 8425935

Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance in healthy, older adults: relationship to age, sex, education, and IQ.

K B Boone1, S Ghaffarian, I M Lesser, E Hill-Gutierrez, N G Berman.   

Abstract

We obtained Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) scores on 91 (35 male and 56 female) healthy, well-educated individuals aged 45 to 83. Women scored better than men on six WCST scores (categories, errors, perseverative responses, % perseverative errors, % conceptual level responses, and trials to first category), while subjects with more than 16 years of education outscored those limited to high school education on four measures (perseverative responses, errors, % perseverative errors, % conceptual level responses). Individuals older than 70 years of age scored less well than younger subjects on only two indices (errors, % conceptual level responses). Full Scale IQ was not related to WCST scores. Our findings suggest that WCST scores should be interpreted within the context of patient gender, education, and age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8425935     DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(199301)49:1<54::aid-jclp2270490108>3.0.co;2-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9762


  22 in total

Review 1.  Executive Functioning in Children and Adolescents Prenatally Exposed to Alcohol: A Meta-Analytic Review.

Authors:  Jennifer E Khoury; Karen Milligan; Todd A Girard
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 7.444

2.  Performance and brain activity during the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder and adolescents with weight-restored anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  Cara Bohon; Noam Weinbach; James Lock
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 4.785

3.  The application of a rodent-based Morris water maze (MWM) protocol to an investigation of age-related differences in human spatial learning.

Authors:  Jimmy Y Zhong; Kathy R Magnusson; Matthew E Swarts; Cherita A Clendinen; Nadjalisse C Reynolds; Scott D Moffat
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 4.  Is cognitive functioning impaired in methamphetamine users? A critical review.

Authors:  Carl L Hart; Caroline B Marvin; Rae Silver; Edward E Smith
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 5.  A hypothesis about how early developmental methylmercury exposure disrupts behavior in adulthood.

Authors:  M Christopher Newland; Miranda N Reed; Erin Rasmussen
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Executive functions in elderly men.

Authors:  Mu-En Liu; Yun-Hsuan Chang; Yan-Chiou Ku; Sheng-Yu Lee; Chih-Chung Huang; Shiou-Lan Chen; Shih-Heng Chen; Chun-Hsien Chu; Wen-Chien Liu; Ru-Band Lu
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2011-02-19

7.  Learning and generalization in healthy aging: implication for frontostriatal and hippocampal function.

Authors:  Rakhee Krishna; Ahmed A Moustafa; L Alan Eby; Leslie C Skeen; Catherine E Myers
Journal:  Cogn Behav Neurol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.600

8.  Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex magnetic resonance imaging measurements and cognitive performance in autism.

Authors:  Jessica Griebling; Nancy J Minshew; Kimberly Bodner; Robin Libove; Rahul Bansal; Prasad Konasale; Matcheri S Keshavan; Antonio Hardan
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 1.987

Review 9.  Methylmercury and nutrition: adult effects of fetal exposure in experimental models.

Authors:  M Christopher Newland; Elliott M Paletz; Miranda N Reed
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2008-07-05       Impact factor: 4.294

10.  A within-subject consideration of the psychotic spectrum disorder concept in a patient in remission associated with cortical gray matter recovery.

Authors:  Herbert Y Meltzer; Min Young Sim; Adam Anderson; Christopher Cannistraci; Karu Jayathilake; Daniel Barrett Share; Myung Lee
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 5.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.