Literature DB >> 8424478

Tympanic and transtympanic electrocochleography in acoustic neuroma and vestibular nerve section surgery.

S M Winzenburg1, R H Margolis, S C Levine, S J Haines, E M Fournier.   

Abstract

Eighth nerve action potential (AP) amplitudes and latencies and cochlear microphonic (CM) amplitudes were compared using tympanic and transtympanic electrocochleography (ECOG) in two patient groups. Tympanic ECOG was performed with a wick electrode placed on the tympanic membrane (TM). Transtympanic ECOG was performed with a needle electrode placed on the promontory of the anesthetized patient. Eighteen subjects were tested by tympanic ECOG as part of a preoperative assessment for either acoustic neuroma removal or transection of the vestibular portion of the eighth cranial nerve. Surgery occurred within 1 week of the preoperative evaluation. Intraoperative auditory monitoring was performed using transtympanic ECOG. Baseline recordings were compared to the preoperative tympanic ECOG data. Stimuli were condensation and rarefaction clicks and tone bursts, presented by an insert earphone. As expected, the two methods resulted in essentially identical response latencies and large amplitude differences, although the response amplitudes were extremely variable. The AP amplitude and the CM amplitude did not increase by the same factor with the transtympanic (TT) electrode compared to the tympanic electrode. On comparison of preoperative and intraoperative response amplitudes with regard to stimulus polarity, tympanic electrocochleography appears to be a useful method of gathering preliminary information on the status of the patient's auditory system. In this study, tympanic ECOG was found to have some predictive value when trying to ascertain the best intraoperative monitoring situation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8424478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Otol        ISSN: 0192-9763


  6 in total

1.  Neuromonitoring of cochlea and auditory nerve with multiple extracted parameters during induced hypoxia and nerve manipulation.

Authors:  Jorge Bohórquez; Ozcan Ozdamar; Krzysztof Morawski; Fred F Telischi; Rafael E Delgado; Erdem Yavuz
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Non-invasive intraoperative monitoring of cochlear function by cochlear microphonics during cerebellopontine-angle surgery.

Authors:  Blandine Lourenço; Béatriz Madero; Stéphane Tringali; Xavier Dubernard; Toufic Khalil; André Chays; Arnaud Bazin; Thierry Mom; Paul Avan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Intraoperative monitoring during surgery for acoustic neuroma: benefits of an extratympanic intrameatal electrode.

Authors:  N Mullatti; H B Coakham; A R Maw; S R Butler; M H Morgan
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Intraoperative monitoring of hearing during cerebellopontine angle tumor surgery using transtympanic electrocochleography.

Authors:  Krzysztof F Morawski; Kazimierz Niemczyk; Jorge Bohorquez; Andrzej Marchel; Rafael E Delgado; Ozcan Ozdamar; Fred F Telischi
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Outer Hair Cell and Auditory Nerve Function in Speech Recognition in Quiet and in Background Noise.

Authors:  Richard Hoben; Gifty Easow; Sofia Pevzner; Mark A Parker
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 6.  Extratympanic electrocochleography in the diagnosis of auditory neuropathy/auditory dyssynchrony.

Authors:  Adriana Ribeiro Tavares Anastasio; Kátia de Freitas Alvarenga; Orozimbo Alves Costa Filho
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.