Literature DB >> 8423943

Vibroacoustic-induced fetal movement: two stimuli and two methods of scoring.

B S Kisilevsky1, K L Kilpatrick, J A Low.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the fetal movement response elicited by vibroacoustic stimulation depends upon the vibrator and the method used to judge movement.
METHODS: Two methods of obtaining elicited fetal movement responses--maternal perceptions and ultrasound scan observations--were compared using two different vibroacoustic stimuli in 16 low-risk term pregnancies.
RESULTS: Analyses of response over trials showed that the percentage of agreement between ultrasound scan observations and maternal perceptions varied (52-96%) across stimuli. The mothers perceived 64% less movement when vibrator 1 was used and 14% less movement response with vibrator 2. Analyses of average movement scores across subjects showed similar results. Vibrator 1 elicited significantly fewer maternal perceptions of fetal movement compared with ultrasound scan observation (an average of 0.8/3 compared with 2.3/3 movements per subject, respectively). For vibrator 2, there were no differences in average movement scores obtained by maternal perception and ultrasound scan observation (an average of 2.4/3 versus 2.8/3, respectively).
CONCLUSION: The stimulus used in vibroacoustic stimulation testing influences the reliability of maternal movement perceptions as compared with ultrasound scan observations.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8423943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  1 in total

1.  Ultrasonographic Investigation of Human Fetus Responses to Maternal Communicative and Non-communicative Stimuli.

Authors:  Gabriella A Ferrari; Ylenia Nicolini; Elisa Demuru; Cecilia Tosato; Merhi Hussain; Elena Scesa; Luisa Romei; Maria Boerci; Emanuela Iappini; Guido Dalla Rosa Prati; Elisabetta Palagi; Pier F Ferrari
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.