Literature DB >> 8423662

Intensive care, survival, and expense of treating critically ill cancer patients.

D V Schapira1, J Studnicki, D D Bradham, P Wolff, A Jarrett.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the survival and factors affecting the survival of patients with solid tumors and hematologic cancers who were admitted to the intensive care unit, the time these patients spent at home (meaningful survival) before they died, and the cost per year of life gained and per year of life gained at home.
DESIGN: Survival and cost-effectiveness analysis.
SETTING: A tertiary-care cancer center at a university medical center. PATIENTS: Every patient admitted to the intensive care unit between July 1, 1988, and June 30, 1990, was entered into the study. This group comprised 83 patients with solid tumors and 64 patients with hematologic cancers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Factors affecting survival, such as age, sex, malignancy, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and necessity for mechanical ventilator assistance, as well as cost per year of life gained and cost per year of life gained at home.
RESULTS: The only factor that significantly affected survival was the requirement for mechanically assisted ventilation for patients with hematologic cancers. More than three fourths of the patients in either group spent less than 3 months at home before dying. The cost per year of life gained for patients with solid tumors was $82,845 and for patients with hematologic cancers was $189,339. The cost per year of life gained at home was $95,142 for patients with solid tumors and $449,544 for patients with hematologic cancers.
CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with solid tumors and hematologic cancers admitted to the intensive care unit die before discharge, or, if they survive the hospital admission, they spend a minimal amount of time at home before dying. This limited survival is achieved at considerable cost. Physicians who treat patients with neoplastic disease should discuss potential outcomes and the possibility of withdrawing life-supportive therapy if appropriate with the patient and family, so that a reasonable strategy can be agreed on before the initiation of therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health; Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute (Tampa, FL)

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8423662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  33 in total

Review 1.  Physician-assisted suicide in the United States: the underlying factors in technology, health care and palliative medicine--Part one.

Authors:  R F Rizzo
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2000

Review 2.  What are the ethical aspects surrounding intensive care unit admission in patients with cancer?

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Rigaud; Audrey Large; Nicolas Meunier-Beillard; Stéphanie Gélinotte; Pierre-Louis Declercq; Fiona Ecarnot; Auguste Dargent; Jean-Pierre Quenot
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-12

Review 3.  The economics and cost-effectiveness of critical care medicine.

Authors:  D B Chalfin; I L Cohen; J Lambrinos
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  The ethics of excess.

Authors:  R D Lamm
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Marginally effective medical care: ethical analysis of issues in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)

Authors:  M Hilberman; J Kutner; D Parsons; D J Murphy
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  [End-of-life decisions and practices in critically ill patients in the cardiac intensive care unit. A nationwide survey].

Authors:  C Schimmer; K Hamouda; M Oezkur; S-P Sommer; M Leistner; R Leyh
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 0.840

7.  Has survival increased in cancer patients admitted to the ICU? Yes.

Authors:  Djamel Mokart; Stephen M Pastores; Michael Darmon
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Leucopenia is an independent predictor in cancer patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation: a prognostic factor analysis in a series of 168 patients.

Authors:  F Vallot; M Paesmans; T Berghmans; J P Sculier
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Comparison of three severity scores for critically ill cancer patients.

Authors:  Peter Schellongowski; Michael Benesch; Thomas Lang; Friederike Traunmüller; Christian Zauner; Klaus Laczika; Gottfried J Locker; Michael Frass; Thomas Staudinger
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-11-04       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Patient choice, cost, and survival of critically ill cancer patients: a societal dilemma.

Authors:  M Markman
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.