Literature DB >> 8423431

Incidental concept learning, feature frequency, and correlated properties.

W D Wattenmaker1.   

Abstract

Four experiments examined sensitivity to feature frequencies and feature correlations as a function of intentional and incidental concept learning. Feature frequencies were encoded equally well across variations in learning strategies, and although classification decisions in both intentional and incidental conditions preserved correlated features, this sensitivity was achieved through different processes. With intentional learning, sensitivity to correlations resulted from explicit rules, whereas incidental encoding preserved correlations through a similarity-based analogical process. In incidental tasks that promoted exemplar storage, classification decisions were mediated by similarity to retrieved examples, and correlated features were indirectly preserved in this process. The results are discussed in terms of the diversity of encoding processes and representations that can occur with incidental category learning.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8423431     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.19.1.203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  8 in total

1.  The influence of prior knowledge in intentional versus incidental concept learning.

Authors:  W D Wattenmaker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-07

2.  Effect of theory-based feature correlations on typicality judgments.

Authors:  Woo-Kyoung Ahn; Jessecae K Marsh; Christian C Luhmann; Kevin Lee
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-01

3.  Sensitivity and salience of form-function correlations of objects: evidence from feature tasks.

Authors:  J Frederico Marques; Mafalda M Mendes; Ana Raposo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-07

4.  Category learning in the context of co-presented items.

Authors:  Janet K Andrews; Kenneth R Livingston; Kenneth J Kurtz
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2010-11-14

5.  Feature-feature causal relations and statistical co-occurrences in object concepts.

Authors:  Chris McNorgan; Rachel A Kotack; Deborah C Meehan; Ken McRae
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-04

6.  Presentation order and recognition of categorically related examples.

Authors:  D L Medin; J G Bettger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-06

7.  Analogical versus rule-based classification.

Authors:  W D Wattenmaker; H L McQuaid; S J Schwertz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-07

8.  Perceived similarity ratings predict generalization success after traditional category learning and a new paired-associate learning task.

Authors:  Stefania R Ashby; Caitlin R Bowman; Dagmar Zeithamova
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.