Literature DB >> 8423018

Interstitial reirradiation for recurrent gynecologic malignancies: results and analysis of prognostic factors.

M E Randall1, L Evans, K M Greven, A J McCunniff, R M Doline.   

Abstract

Thirteen patients with recurrent or new primary gynecologic malignancies after previous radiation therapy (RT) underwent interstitial reirradiation (IRI) from July 1986 through December 1990. Mean and median ages were 63 and 70 years, respectively. Mean and median implanted volumes were 14.3 and 12 cc, respectively. Overall, 9/13 (69%) had complete responses to IRI and 6 (46%) continue to have no evidence of disease (NED) 24-71 months later (median follow-up, 59 months). Of 7 patients with recurrent cervical or new primary vaginal carcinoma, 5 (71%) remain free of disease 27-71 months (median, 58 months) after IRI. Of 6 patients with recurrent endometrial carcinomas, only 1 (16%) continues with NED 24 months after IRI. Patients with NED after IRI had a median disease-free interval prior to IRI of 100 months compared to 6 months in patients failing IRI. Trends toward improved outcomes were observed in squamous vs adenocarcinoma, smaller tumor volumes, higher implant doses, and vaginal wall/suburethra vs vaginal cuff location. One possible complication, a rectovaginal fistula, developed in the presence of recurrent cervical cancer 22 months after IRI. Interstitial reirradiation is an effective treatment for selected patients with recurrent gynecologic malignancies after previous RT. Advantages of IRI over radical surgery include its potential to preserve organ structure and function and its applicability to patients with medical contraindications to salvage surgery. Furthermore, since subsequent exenterative surgery should not be compromised in patients failing IRI, a policy of IRI as initial treatment may be justified for patients in whom the potential for morbidity is limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8423018     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1993.1005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  5 in total

1.  The efficacy of surgical treatment of recurrent or persistent cervical cancer that develops in a previously irradiated field: a monoinstitutional experience.

Authors:  Seiji Mabuchi; Yuri Matsumoto; Naoko Komura; Masaaki Sawada; Mie Tanaka; Eriko Yokoi; Katsumi Kozasa; Akihiko Yoshimura; Hiromasa Kuroda; Tadashi Kimura
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Practice guidelines for management of cervical cancer in Korea: a Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology Consensus Statement.

Authors:  Myong Cheol Lim; Maria Lee; Seung Hyuk Shim; Eun Ji Nam; Jung Yun Lee; Hyun Jung Kim; Yoo Young Lee; Kwang Beom Lee; Jeong Yeol Park; Yun Hwan Kim; Kyung Do Ki; Yong Jung Song; Hyun Hoon Chung; Sunghoon Kim; Jeong Won Lee; Jae Weon Kim; Duk Soo Bae; Jong Min Lee
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 3.  Re-Irradiation for Recurrent Cervical Cancer: A State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Zongyan Shen; Ang Qu; Ping Jiang; Yuliang Jiang; Haitao Sun; Junjie Wang
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Permanent interstitial re-irradiation with Au-198 seeds in patients with post-radiation locally recurrent uterine carcinoma.

Authors:  Kaori Okazawa; Keiko Yuasa-Nakagawa; Ryo-Ichi Yoshimura; Hitoshi Shibuya
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  Durable Control and Overall Survival Benefit with Focal Reirradiation in Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Arya Amini; Whitney Sumner; Christine M Fisher
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2015-12-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.