Literature DB >> 8422137

Management of screen-detected breast cancer: audit of the first 100 cases in the Southampton and Salisbury breast screening programme.

I Campbell1, G Royle, R Coddington, A Herbert, C Rubin, I Taylor, P Guyer.   

Abstract

With the natural history and optimal treatment of a high proportion of screen-detected breast cancers yet to be determined, treatment poses the management team with a number of therapeutic dilemmas. This study surveys the management policy and treatment of a consecutive series of 100 screen-detected cancers treated in a single breast unit. The problems encountered are discussed. There were 87 women with stage Tis or T1 tumours, including 26 women with in situ cancers, four with invasive cancers less than 5 mm in size, and seven with tubular cancers. Sixty-six women were managed with breast-conserving surgery and 36 women underwent localisation biopsy as the sole surgical treatment of the breast. With selection bias for high-grade and lateral tumours, only 2/13 cancers up to 10 mm in size were lymph node positive on axillary clearance. All lymph node positive women received adjuvant therapy. No adjuvant therapy was given in 43 cases, including those with in situ cancer. Thirty-six had extensive intraductal component (EIC). Patient and surgeon choice tends to be a major factor both in type of surgery and adjuvant therapy for screen-detected breast cancer. The optimal treatment for tumours detected by breast cancer screening is debatable and randomised trials on their management need to be expedited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8422137      PMCID: PMC2497746     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  18 in total

1.  Evaluation of overdiagnosis of breast cancer in screening with mammography: results of the Nijmegen programme.

Authors:  P H Peeters; A L Verbeek; H Straatman; R Holland; J H Hendriks; M Mravunac; C Rothengatter; A Van Dijk-Milatz; J M Werre
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Survival following local skin recurrence after mastectomy.

Authors:  I S Fentiman; P N Matthews; O W Davison; R R Millis; J L Hayward
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Implications from SEER data on breast cancer management.

Authors:  C R Smart; M H Myers; L A Gloeckler
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Comparative pathology of prevalent and incident cancers detected by breast screening. Edinburgh Breast Screening Project.

Authors:  T J Anderson; J Lamb; F Alexander; W Lutz; U Chetty; A P Forrest; A Kirkpatrick; B Muir; M M Roberts; A Huggins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-03-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Comparison of Halsted mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in early breast cancer: long-term results.

Authors:  U Veronesi; A Banfi; M Del Vecchio; R Saccozzi; C Clemente; M Greco; A Luini; E Marubini; G Muscolino; F Rilke
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1986-09

6.  Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  B Fisher; C Redmond; R Poisson; R Margolese; N Wolmark; L Wickerham; E Fisher; M Deutsch; R Caplan; Y Pilch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-03-30       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Prognostic factors of breast recurrence in the conservative management of early breast cancer: a 25-year follow-up.

Authors:  A Fourquet; F Campana; B Zafrani; V Mosseri; P Vielh; J C Durand; J R Vilcoq
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Pathologic predictors of early local recurrence in Stage I and II breast cancer treated by primary radiation therapy.

Authors:  S J Schnitt; J L Connolly; J R Harris; S Hellman; R B Cohen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  The biology and natural history of breast cancer from the screening perspective.

Authors:  L Holmberg; J Pontén; H O Adami
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Ten-year results of a randomized trial comparing a conservative treatment to mastectomy in early breast cancer.

Authors:  D Sarrazin; M G Lê; R Arriagada; G Contesso; F Fontaine; M Spielmann; F Rochard; T Le Chevalier; J Lacour
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 6.280

View more
  3 in total

1.  A comparative audit of prevalent, incident and interval cancers in the Avon breast screening programme.

Authors:  P A Sylvester; M N Vipond; E Kutt; J D Davies; A J Webb; J R Farndon
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  What general practitioners should do about breast screening.

Authors:  P A Creighton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-01-28

3.  'Good prognosis tumours' in breast cancer screening.

Authors:  D Birch; M Payne; Y Chia; S McPherson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 1.891

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.