Literature DB >> 8422053

Evaluating the clarity of research reports written for research subjects.

A A Lash1, E S Kumekawa, C E Becker.   

Abstract

It is not simple to report research results to the people who participated in the research as subjects of study. Few evaluations have examined subjects' understanding of written research findings. In two recent studies of solvent exposure, subjects received brief summaries of the research. Before they were sent, the summaries were evaluated by research, health, and communication specialists as well as by representatives of the target audience. For one of the studies, interviews were conducted with subjects before and after they received the reports. Although the subjects said they understood the summary, their answers to questions about its content indicated otherwise. The results suggest that researchers not rely on subjects' self-assessments of their understanding but instead design methods to test subjects' knowledge directly. Those tests would be most valuable if applied in formative evaluations, when the opportunity exists to improve the research summaries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8422053     DOI: 10.1002/ajim.4700230129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  2 in total

1.  Communicating risks after exposure has ended: former workers' perspectives on PCBs.

Authors:  Kaori Fujishiro; Amy Mobley; Everett Lehman
Journal:  New Solut       Date:  2013-01-01

2.  Communicating the results of clinical research to participants: attitudes, practices, and future directions.

Authors:  David I Shalowitz; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 11.069

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.