Literature DB >> 8421787

The promotion of health through planned sociopolitical change: challenges for research and policy.

J B McKinlay1.   

Abstract

The focus of health promotion is moving from the level of individuals to organizations, communities and broader social policy. Traditional quantitative methods (e.g. social surveys and experimental designs) which are variously appropriate at the level of individual behavior change require adaptation and refinement when sociopolitical change becomes the mechanism for health promotion. Because of their training and experience health services researchers and health educators (especially psychologists) are understandably resistant to necessary methodologic changes. Well designed and carefully conducted qualitative studies (e.g. ethnographic interviewing, participant observation, case studies and focus group activities) are required to complement quantitative approaches, and can fill gaps where quantitative techniques are suboptimal or even inappropriate: hard qualitative techniques can support soft quantitative methods. Their utility in process evaluation is now beyond dispute. Recent work at the New England Research Institute (NERI) is used to illustrate the role of qualitative research in the evaluation of health promotion through planned sociopolitical change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8421787     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90202-f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  34 in total

1.  From concept to practice: including the social determinants of health in environmental assessments.

Authors:  R Banken
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec

Review 2.  A tale of 3 tails.

Authors:  J B McKinlay; L D Marceau
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Multilevel ecoepidemiology and parsimony.

Authors:  J P Mackenbach
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Our conscientious objection to the epidemiology wars.

Authors:  C Poole; K J Rothman
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  The CARE-CDC health initiative: a model for global participatory research.

Authors:  P L Riley; R Jossy; L Nkinsi; L Buhi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 6.  Reconsidering community-based health promotion: promise, performance, and potential.

Authors:  Cheryl Merzel; Joanna D'Afflitti
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 7.  Reducing social disparities in tobacco use: a social-contextual model for reducing tobacco use among blue-collar workers.

Authors:  Glorian Sorensen; Elizabeth Barbeau; Mary Kay Hunt; Karen Emmons
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 8.  Is social capital the key to inequalities in health?

Authors:  Neil Pearce; George Davey Smith
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Changing pattern of ill health for indigenous people.

Authors:  Sunia Foliaki; Neil Pearce
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-08-23

10.  Moving from description to action: challenges in researching socio-economic inequalities in health.

Authors:  Peter Tugwell; Betsy Kristjansson
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.