Literature DB >> 8420873

The TCD50 and regrowth delay assay in human tumor xenografts: differences and implications.

W Budach1, V Budach, M Stuschke, S Dinges, H Sack.   

Abstract

The response to irradiation of five human xenograft cell lines--a malignant paraganglioma, a neurogenic sarcoma, a malignant histiocytoma, a primary lymphoma of the brain, and a squamous cell carcinoma--were tested in nude mice. All mice underwent 5 Gy whole body irradiation prior to xenotransplantation to minimize the residual immune response. The subcutaneous tumors were irradiated at a tumor volume of 120mm3 under acutely hypoxic conditions with single doses between 8 Gy and 80 Gy depending on the expected radiation sensitivity of the tumor line. Endpoints of the study were the tumor control dose 50% (TCD50) and the regrowth delay endpoints growth delay, specific growth delay, and the tumor bed effect corrected specific growth delay. Specific growth delay and corrected specific growth delay at 76% of the TCD50 was used in order to compare the data to previously published data from spheroids. The lowest TCD50 was found in the lymphoma with 24.9 Gy, whereas the TCD50 of the soft tissue sarcomas and the squamous cell carcinoma ranged from 57.8 Gy to 65.6 Gy. The isoeffective dose levels for the induction of 30 days growth delay, a specific growth delay of 3, and a corrected specific growth delay of 3 ranged from 15.5 Gy (ECL1) to 37.1 Gy (FADU), from 7.2 Gy (ENE2) to 45.6 Gy (EPG1) and from 9.2 Gy (ENE2) to 37.6 Gy (EPG1), respectively. The corrected specific growth delay at 76% of the TCD50 was correlated with the number of tumor rescue units per 100 cells in spheroids, which was available for three tumor lines, and with the tumor doubling time in xenografts (n = 5). The TCD50 values corresponded better to the clinical experience than the regrowth delay data. There was no correlation between TCD50 and any of the regrowth delay endpoints. This missing correlation was most likely a result of large differences in the number of tumor rescue units in human xenografts of the same size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8420873     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(93)90347-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  5 in total

Review 1.  Improving the Predictive Value of Preclinical Studies in Support of Radiotherapy Clinical Trials.

Authors:  C Norman Coleman; Geoff S Higgins; J Martin Brown; Michael Baumann; David G Kirsch; Henning Willers; Pataje G S Prasanna; Mark W Dewhirst; Eric J Bernhard; Mansoor M Ahmed
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Mitomycin C in combination with radiotherapy as a potent inhibitor of tumour cell repopulation in a human squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Wilfried Budach; F Paulsen; S Welz; J Classen; H Scheithauer; P Marini; C Belka; M Bamberg
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 3.  Implementation of the Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane (CAM) Model in Radiation Biology and Experimental Radiation Oncology Research.

Authors:  Nicole Dünker; Verena Jendrossek
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Long-term in vitro 2D-culture of SDHB and SDHD-related human paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Bayley; Heggert G Rebel; Kimberly Scheurwater; Dominique Duesman; Juan Zhang; Francesca Schiavi; Esther Korpershoek; Jeroen C Jansen; Abbey Schepers; Peter Devilee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Screening and Validation of Molecular Targeted Radiosensitizers.

Authors:  Henning Willers; Xiao Pan; Nathalie Borgeaud; Irina Korovina; Lydia Koi; Regina Egan; Patricia Greninger; Aliza Rosenkranz; Jong Kung; Andrew S Liss; Leslie A Parsels; Meredith A Morgan; Theodore S Lawrence; Steven H Lin; Theodore S Hong; Beow Y Yeap; Lori J Wirth; Aaron N Hata; Christopher J Ott; Cyril H Benes; Michael Baumann; Mechthild Krause
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 7.038

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.