OBJECTIVE: To determine practice and attitudes of acute-critical care nurses toward the use of physical restraints. DESIGN: Survey with a self-administered anonymous questionnaire. SUBJECTS: A self-selected sample of 235 acute-critical care nurses from 17 states who were enrolled in critical care review classes. MEASUREMENTS: Data were gathered by use of a questionnaire developed by the researchers. The questionnaire was designed to elicit information regarding demographic and professional characteristics, nursing practice, and attitudes toward the use of restraints. Nurses responded to the practice items on a three-point Likert Scale as to whether they "always," "sometimes," or "never" carried out the procedure. To obtain information on attitudes, nurses were asked to respond on a three-point Likert Scale as to whether they "agreed," were "undecided," or "disagreed" with the statement. RESULTS: Responses indicated 78% of the sample "always" try alternative nursing measures before restraining the patient. However, when units were believed to be understaffed there was more reliance on restraints. Thirty-eight percent of the sample would "always" rather sedate patients than physically restrain them. The overall score on the attitude component of the questionnaire reflected positive or acceptable attitudes toward the use of restraints. Most (62%) "agreed" that a patient suffers a loss of dignity when placed in restraints. Significant relationships did exist between select demographic and professional characteristics and practice and attitudes regarding the use of restraints. The longer the respondents had worked in critical care the more appropriate (positive) their attitudes toward the use of restraints (r = -.211, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: In general, nursing practice and attitudes regarding the use of physical restraints indicated that respondents were using restraints in accordance with accepted practice. There is a need for additional research in this area, especially regarding the use of alternative measures to physical restraints.
OBJECTIVE: To determine practice and attitudes of acute-critical care nurses toward the use of physical restraints. DESIGN: Survey with a self-administered anonymous questionnaire. SUBJECTS: A self-selected sample of 235 acute-critical care nurses from 17 states who were enrolled in critical care review classes. MEASUREMENTS: Data were gathered by use of a questionnaire developed by the researchers. The questionnaire was designed to elicit information regarding demographic and professional characteristics, nursing practice, and attitudes toward the use of restraints. Nurses responded to the practice items on a three-point Likert Scale as to whether they "always," "sometimes," or "never" carried out the procedure. To obtain information on attitudes, nurses were asked to respond on a three-point Likert Scale as to whether they "agreed," were "undecided," or "disagreed" with the statement. RESULTS: Responses indicated 78% of the sample "always" try alternative nursing measures before restraining the patient. However, when units were believed to be understaffed there was more reliance on restraints. Thirty-eight percent of the sample would "always" rather sedate patients than physically restrain them. The overall score on the attitude component of the questionnaire reflected positive or acceptable attitudes toward the use of restraints. Most (62%) "agreed" that a patient suffers a loss of dignity when placed in restraints. Significant relationships did exist between select demographic and professional characteristics and practice and attitudes regarding the use of restraints. The longer the respondents had worked in critical care the more appropriate (positive) their attitudes toward the use of restraints (r = -.211, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: In general, nursing practice and attitudes regarding the use of physical restraints indicated that respondents were using restraints in accordance with accepted practice. There is a need for additional research in this area, especially regarding the use of alternative measures to physical restraints.
Entities:
Keywords:
Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship