Literature DB >> 8420470

Measurement of mucosal wave propagation and vertical phase difference in vocal fold vibration.

I R Titze1, J J Jiang, T Y Hsiao.   

Abstract

Examination of the surface wave properties of the vocal fold mucosa is becoming an important part of assessment of vocal function. A key wave property is propagation velocity, which determines the phase delay between the upper and lower margins of the vocal folds. Excised canine larynges were used to measure this phase delay, and therewith propagation velocity. The motion of two flesh points was tracked stroboscopically. Differential displacements between the flesh points were matched to displacements of a model. A least-squared fit of the data to the model provided the numeric values of propagation velocity, which varied from 0.5 m/s to about 2.0 m/s, depending on fundamental frequency. The corresponding phase delay along the medial surface of the vocal folds varied from about 60 degrees/mm to 30 degrees/mm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8420470     DOI: 10.1177/000348949310200111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol        ISSN: 0003-4894            Impact factor:   1.547


  15 in total

1.  [Basic research on vocal fold dynamics: three-dimensional vibration analysis of human and canine larynges].

Authors:  M Döllinger; F Rosanowski; U Eysholdt; J Lohscheller
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  A lumped mucosal wave model of the vocal folds revisited: recent extensions and oscillation hysteresis.

Authors:  Jorge C Lucero; Laura L Koenig; Kelem G Lourenço; Nicolas Ruty; Xavier Pelorson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Identification of geometric parameters influencing the flow-induced vibration of a two-layer self-oscillating computational vocal fold model.

Authors:  Brian A Pickup; Scott L Thomson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Phonation threshold pressure: comparison of calculations and measurements taken with physical models of the vocal fold mucosa.

Authors:  Lewis P Fulcher; Ronald C Scherer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Vibratory responses of synthetic, self-oscillating vocal fold models.

Authors:  Preston R Murray; Scott L Thomson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Dynamic vocal fold parameters with changing adduction in ex-vivo hemilarynx experiments.

Authors:  Michael Döllinger; David A Berry; Stefan Kniesburges
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Influence of numerical model decisions on the flow-induced vibration of a computational vocal fold model.

Authors:  Timothy E Shurtz; Scott L Thomson
Journal:  Comput Struct       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 4.578

8.  An automatic method to quantify mucosal waves via videokymography.

Authors:  Jack J Jiang; Yu Zhang; Michael P Kelly; Erik T Bieging; Matthew R Hoffman
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  A synthetic, self-oscillating vocal fold model platform for studying augmentation injection.

Authors:  Preston R Murray; Scott L Thomson; Marshall E Smith
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  A self-oscillating biophysical computer model of the elongated vocal fold.

Authors:  Chao Tao; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.589

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.