Literature DB >> 8420420

Diagnosis of pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients. Repeatability of the protected specimen brush.

C H Marquette1, F Herengt, D Mathieu, F Saulnier, R Courcol, P Ramon.   

Abstract

The repeatability (i.e., the variation in repeated measurements of the same quantity) of the protected specimen brush (PSB) with quantitative cultures was assessed in 22 consecutive mechanically ventilated (MV) patients with suspected nosocomial pneumonia. Five PSB samples were collected in the same lung area during the same bronchoscopic procedure and processed for bacteriologic identification and quantitative culture. A laboratory control was also performed in order to assess the in vitro repeatability of the quantitative culture technique. The five PSB always recovered the same microorganisms, indicating a 100% qualitative repeatability for the PSB. Conversely, the quantitative repeatability was somewhat lower since in 59% of the patients the quantitative results varied by more than one log10, which is the minimal precision affordable with quantitative cultures. The distinction between presence or absence of infection based on the 10(3) cfu/ml recommended diagnostic threshold was, however, only moderately affected by the variability of the quantitative results since only three of 22 patients (13.6%) displayed results spread out on each side of the 10(3) cfu/ml break point. Intrasubject variability of quantitative results was not explained by problems with the quantitative culture technique, which proved excellent repeatability in the laboratory. This study indicated that, although the PSB technique with quantitative cultures displays an acceptable level of repeatability, caution is advisable when interpreting PSB results in critically ill patients with suspected pneumonia, especially if one refers to the 10(3) cfu/ml recommended diagnostic threshold and if a decision to treat or to abstain from treating is to be made.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8420420     DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm/147.1.211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis        ISSN: 0003-0805


  8 in total

Review 1.  Acute respiratory distress syndrome and nosocomial pneumonia.

Authors:  T T Bauer; A Torres
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Ventilator-associated pneumonia: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.

Authors:  Steven M Koenig; Jonathon D Truwit
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Detection of respiratory pathogens in clinical samples using metagenomic shotgun sequencing.

Authors:  Chao Qi; Peter Hountras; Chiagozie Ononye Pickens; James M Walter; Jacqueline M Kruser; Benjamin D Singer; Patrick Seed; Stefan J Green; Richard G Wunderink
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 2.472

Review 4.  Bronchoscopic diagnosis of pneumonia.

Authors:  V S Baselski; R G Wunderink
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 5.  The pulmonary physician in critical care * 4: Nosocomial pneumonia.

Authors:  S Ewig; T Bauer; A Torres
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Clinical practice guidelines for hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults.

Authors:  Coleman Rotstein; Gerald Evans; Abraham Born; Ronald Grossman; R Bruce Light; Sheldon Magder; Barrie McTaggart; Karl Weiss; George G Zhanel
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.471

Review 7.  Ventilator-associated pneumonia or not? Contemporary diagnosis.

Authors:  C G Mayhall
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 8.  Pro/con clinical debate: the use of a protected specimen brush in the diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia.

Authors:  Daren Heyland; Santiago Ewig; Antoni Torres
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2002-02-13       Impact factor: 9.097

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.