Literature DB >> 8420224

Measurement of cardiac output by automated single-breath technique, and comparison with thermodilution and Fick methods in patients with cardiac disease.

M R Zenger1, M Brenner, M Haruno, D Mahon, A F Wilson.   

Abstract

Accurate noninvasive methods are needed for determination of cardiac output. Current methods are generally complex or may be unreliable. A previously described method, based on absorption of acetylene gas during a constant exhalation that enables calculation of cardiac output by estimating pulmonary capillary circulation, is incorporated in a new, automated commercial product (SensorMedics 2200). In this study, cardiac output by single-breath acetylene blood flow measured with this device was compared with the standard thermodilution and direct Fick methods in 20 patients undergoing cardiac or pulmonary artery catheterization. Patients inhaled test gas mixture to total lung capacity and exhaled at a constant rate through an adjustable resistor. Lung volumes and noninvasive acetylene blood flow value were calculated automatically. Correlation between the automated single-breath technique and both thermodilution and Fick cardiac output determinations was very high (correlation coefficients were 0.90 and 0.92, respectively), regression slopes were close to identity (0.98 and 0.90), and bias (-0.39 and -0.79 liter/min) and precision (0.94 and 1.02) were good; when shunt correction was applied, bias was reduced to 0.06 and 0.35 liter/min, respectively. Rapid, accurate, noninvasive measurement of cardiac output was easily obtained using the automated device. This technique may have a wide applicability for noninvasive evaluation of patients with cardiac disease and for monitoring effects of therapeutic interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8420224     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90719-s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  7 in total

1.  The effects of autonomic dysfunction and endurance training on cardiovascular control.

Authors:  J M Wecht; R E De Meersman; J P Weir; A M Spungen; W A Bauman; D R Grimm
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.435

Review 2.  Reliability and validity of measures of cardiac output during incremental to maximal aerobic exercise. Part II: Novel techniques and new advances.

Authors:  D E Warburton; M J Haykowsky; H A Quinney; D P Humen; K K Teo
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Cardiac Output Assessment in Patients Supported with Left Ventricular Assist Device: Discordance Between Thermodilution and Indirect Fick Cardiac Output Measurements.

Authors:  David M Tehrani; Jonathan Grinstein; Sara Kalantari; Gene Kim; Nitasha Sarswat; Sirtaz Adatya; Gabriel Sayer; Nir Uriel
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 2.872

4.  Comparison and reliability of two non-invasive acetylene uptake techniques for the measurement of cardiac output.

Authors:  D W Dibski; D J Smith; R Jensen; S R Norris; G T Ford
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Evaluation of cardiac output from a tidally ventilated homogeneous lung model.

Authors:  Habib Benallal; Kenneth C Beck; Bruce D Johnson; Thierry Busso
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Measurement of transfer factor during constant exhalation.

Authors:  A F Wilson; J Hearne; M Brenner; R Alfonso
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Noninvasive Assessment of Cardiac Output: Accuracy and Precision of the Closed-Circuit Acetylene Rebreathing Technique for Cardiac Output Measurement.

Authors:  E Ashley Hardin; Douglas Stoller; Justin Lawley; Erin J Howden; Michinari Hieda; James Pawelczyk; Sara Jarvis; Kim Prisk; Satyam Sarma; Benjamin D Levine
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 5.501

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.