Literature DB >> 8419058

Reliability and feasibility of pregnancy home-use tests: laboratory validation and diagnostic evaluation by 638 volunteers.

J Daviaud1, D Fournet, C Ballongue, G P Guillem, A Leblanc, C Casellas, B Pau.   

Abstract

All 27 home-use tests sold in France in 1989 for the self-diagnosis of pregnancy were evaluated. The kits were first tested by qualified clinical chemistry technologists. Eleven kits with 100% specificity and 100% sensitivity were retained for the diagnostic study. Each of 638 laywomen was given a kit and asked to perform the assay with a coded urine specimen containing either no human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) or an hCG concentration adjusted to the claimed detection limit (1 DL) or twice the detection limit (2 DL). After testing, each participant filled out a detailed questionnaire. The results showed a diagnostic specificity of 86-100% for 10 kits but a diagnostic sensitivity of 85-100% for only 5 kits at 2 DL and for only 2 at 1 DL. Among the 478 positive urine samples distributed, 230 were falsely interpreted as negative. The main explanation for such a high percentage of false-negative results was difficulty in understanding the explanatory leaflets accompanying the kits and hence in reading the results, regardless of the socioeconomic situation of the participant. We conclude that pregnancy home-use tests should be subjected to rigorous analytical controls and evaluated by a panel of potential users before being released on the market.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8419058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  5 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of near patient test evaluations in primary care.

Authors:  B C Delaney; C J Hyde; R J McManus; S Wilson; D A Fitzmaurice; S Jowett; R Tobias; G H Thorpe; F D Hobbs
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-25

2.  The ethics and economics of out-of-laboratory testing.

Authors:  M J McQueen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-12-01       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Strips of Hope: Accuracy of Home Pregnancy Tests and New Developments.

Authors:  C Gnoth; S Johnson
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.915

4.  The effect of uncertainty in patient classification on diagnostic performance estimations.

Authors:  Leo C McHugh; Kevin Snyder; Thomas D Yager
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  The value of home-based collection of biospecimens in reproductive epidemiology.

Authors:  John C Rockett; Germaine M Buck; Courtney D Lynch; Sally D Perreault
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 9.031

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.