Literature DB >> 8417700

Univentricular and biventricular Thoratec VAD support as a bridge to transplantation.

D J Farrar1, J D Hill.   

Abstract

As of October 1991, the Thoratec ventricular assist device (VAD) system has been used in 154 transplant candidates who were in imminent risk of dying before donor heart procurement at 39 medical centers in 10 countries. The VAD system consists of a prosthetic ventricle with a 65-mL pumping chamber made from Thoratec's BPS-215M polyurethane, cannulas for atrial or ventricular inflow and arterial outflow connections, and a pneumatic drive console. The devices can be used for partial or complete support of the pulmonary, systemic, or both circulations. In all patients (average age, 42 years; range, 11 to 64 years), the pumps were placed in a paracorporeal position on the anterior abdominal wall and connected to the heart and great vessels by cannulas crossing the chest wall. Biventricular support was used in 120 patients (78%) and isolated left VADs were used in 34. Average flow rate was 5.0 +/- 0.9 L/min for the left VAD and 4.3 +/- 0.8 L/min for the right VAD. The most frequent complications were bleeding (42% incidence, 7% mortality) and infection (36% incidence, 8% mortality). Ninety-eight patients (65%) recovered sufficiently to undergo heart transplantation after 8 hours to 226 days of support (average, 17.5 days), and 3 are waiting on VADs for transplantation. Eighty-two patients who received transplants have been discharged. This is an 84% early post-transplantation survival and a 54% overall survival. The actuarial survival 1 year after transplantation is 82%, comparable with that of conventional heart transplantation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8417700     DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(93)90537-r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  7 in total

1.  Left ventricular assist devices: an ethical analysis.

Authors:  Katrina A Bramstedt
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 2.  Mechanical cardiopulmonary support in children and young adults: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ventricular assist devices, and long-term support devices.

Authors:  A C Chang; E D McKenzie
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  An overview of approved and investigational left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Randy Marcel; Dan M Meyer
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2004-10

Review 4.  Acute circulatory support.

Authors:  M J Barnard; S P Linter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-07-03

5.  Ventricular assist devices as a bridge to cardiac transplantation. A prelude to destination therapy.

Authors:  W L Holman; R C Bourge; R D Spruell; C P Murrah; D C McGiffin; J K Kirklin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Review and reflections about pulsatile ventricular assist devices from history to future: concerning safety and low haemolysis-still needed.

Authors:  Inge Köhne
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 1.731

7.  5-year results of a newly implemented mechanical circulatory support program for terminal heart failure patients in a Swiss non-cardiac transplant university hospital.

Authors:  Thibault Schaeffer; Otmar Pfister; Constantin Mork; Paul Mohacsi; Florian Rueter; Simon Scheifele; Anne Morgen; Urs Zenklusen; Thomas Doebele; Markus Maurer; Joachim Erb; Jens Fassl; Nadine Cueni; Martin Siegemund; Hans Pargger; Brigitta Gahl; Stefan Osswald; Friedrich Eckstein; Martin Grapow
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 1.637

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.