Literature DB >> 8416594

Intravenous sedation for MR imaging of the brain and spine in children: pentobarbital versus propofol.

E L Bloomfield1, T J Masaryk, A Caplin, N A Obuchowski, A Schubert, J Hayden, Z Y Ebrahim, P M Ruggieri, M J Goske, J S Ross.   

Abstract

The authors present a prospective study of single-agent pediatric sedation regimens for patients older than 2 years of age undergoing magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the brain and spine. Thirty patients underwent MR imaging after intravenous administration of pentobarbital in successive boluses of 2.5 mg/kg to a maximum of 7.5 mg/kg. Thirty-one patients received an intravenous bolus followed by continuous infusion of propofol. The dosage schedule for propofol was 2 mg/kg (with supplemental 1 mg/kg boluses) followed by continuous infusion of 6 mg/kg per hour. There was no significant difference in the physiologic response to sedation between the two groups, although the magnitude of the drop in pulse was significantly greater in the group receiving propofol. Three patients receiving propofol experienced transient decreases in oxygen saturation, at variable times over the course of the procedure. However, patients recovered significantly faster from sedation with propofol. While propofol may represent a viable alternative to pentobarbital in selected patients, propofol requires constant physician supervision and meticulous technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8416594     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.186.1.8416594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  10 in total

1.  Emergency analgesia in the paediatric population. Part IV Paediatric sedation in the accident and emergency department: pros and cons.

Authors:  E Doyle
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 2.  Sedation in pediatric patients.

Authors:  S Suresh; S C Hall
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  Hyperintense signal abnormality in subarachnoid spaces and basal cisterns on MR images of children anesthetized with propofol: new fluid-attenuated inversion recovery finding.

Authors:  C G Filippi; A M Ulug; D Lin; L A Heier; R D Zimmerman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Wada testing in pediatric patients by use of propofol anesthesia.

Authors:  L T Masters; K Perrine; O Devinsky; P K Nelson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  Comparative review of the adverse effects of sedatives used in children undergoing outpatient procedures.

Authors:  J D'Agostino; T E Terndrup
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 6.  Propofol. An update of its use in anaesthesia and conscious sedation.

Authors:  H M Bryson; B R Fulton; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Procedural sedation analgesia.

Authors:  Saad A Sheta
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2010-01

8.  A comparison of the sedative, hemodynamic, and respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jaydev Dave; Sandip Vaghela
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2011-07

9.  Complications of three deep sedation methods for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Solina Tith; Kirk Lalwani; Rongwei Fu
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-04

10.  A randomized trial evaluating low doses of propofol infusion after intravenous ketamine for ambulatory pediatric magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Divya Sethi; Madhu Gupta; Shalini Subramanian
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2014-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.