Literature DB >> 8416477

Inadvertent administration of positive end-distending pressure during nasal cannula flow.

R G Locke1, M R Wolfson, T H Shaffer, S D Rubenstein, J S Greenspan.   

Abstract

In the clinical setting, nasal cannulas are frequently used to deliver supplemental oxygen to neonates and are not believed to affect the general respiratory status. In contrast, it was hypothesized that clinical changes associated with nasal cannula gas flow may be related in part to the generation of positive end-distending pressure. To test this hypothesis, alterations in esophageal pressure were quantified as an indication of end-distending pressure and thoracoabdominal motion was quantified as an indication of breathing patterns in 13 preterm infants at gas flow levels of 0.5, 1, and 2 L/min delivered by nasal cannula with an outer diameter of either 0.2 or 0.3 cm. Changes in esophageal pressure were assessed by esophageal balloon manometry. Ventilatory patterns were assessed from thoracoabdominal motion by using respiratory inductive plethysmography. Thoracoabdominal motion was quantitated as a phase angle (theta); larger values represent greater asynchrony. The 0.2-cm nasal cannula did not deliver pressure or alter thoracoabdominal motion at any flow. In contrast, the 0.3-cm nasal cannula delivered positive end-distending pressure as a function of increasing levels of gas flow (r = .92) and reduced thoracoabdominal motion asynchrony. The mean pressure generated at 2 L/min was 9.8 cm H2O. These data demonstrate that nasal cannula gas flow can deliver positive end-distending pressure to infants and significantly alter their breathing strategy. This finding raises important concerns about the indiscriminate therapeutic use, size selection, and safety of nasal cannulas for the routine delivery of oxygen in preterm infants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8416477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  28 in total

Review 1.  Nasal CPAP for neonates: what do we know in 2003?

Authors:  A G De Paoli; C Morley; P G Davis
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 2.  Neonatal non-invasive respiratory support: physiological implications.

Authors:  Thomas H Shaffer; Deepthi Alapati; Jay S Greenspan; Marla R Wolfson
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  2012-07-06

Review 3.  Weaning preterm infants from continuous positive airway pressure: evidence for best practice.

Authors:  Hesham Abdel-Hady; Basma Shouman; Nehad Nasef
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 2.764

4.  High-Flow Oxygen and High-Flow Air for Dyspnea in Hospitalized Patients with Cancer: A Pilot Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  David Hui; Farley Hernandez; Diana Urbauer; Saji Thomas; Zhanni Lu; Ahmed Elsayem; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-12-15

5.  Supplemental Oxygen for Treatment of Infants With Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Authors:  Justin Brockbank; Carmen Leon Astudillo; Datian Che; Archwin Tanphaichitr; Guixia Huang; Jaime Tomko; Narong Simakajornboon
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 4.062

Review 6.  Use of high flow nasal cannula in critically ill infants, children, and adults: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Jan Hau Lee; Kyle J Rehder; Lee Williford; Ira M Cheifetz; David A Turner
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  High-flow nasal cannula: impact on oxygenation and ventilation in an acute lung injury model.

Authors:  Meg Frizzola; Thomas L Miller; Maria Elena Rodriguez; Yan Zhu; Jorge Rojas; Anne Hesek; Angela Stump; Thomas H Shaffer; Kevin Dysart
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  2010-11-23

8.  Work of breathing indices in infants with respiratory insufficiency receiving high-flow nasal cannula and nasal continuous positive airway pressure.

Authors:  B E de Jongh; R Locke; A Mackley; J Emberger; D Bostick; J Stefano; E Rodriguez; T H Shaffer
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 9.  Safe paediatric intensive care. Part 1: Does more medical care lead to improved outcome?

Authors:  Bernhard Frey; Andrew Argent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Nasal high-flow therapy delivers low level positive airway pressure.

Authors:  R Parke; S McGuinness; M Eccleston
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 9.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.