Literature DB >> 8416437

The marketplace in health care reform. The demographic limitations of managed competition.

R Kronick1, D C Goodman, J Wennberg, E Wagner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The theory of managed competition holds that the quality and economy of health care delivery will improve if independent provider groups compete for consumers. In sparsely populated areas where relatively few providers are required, however, it is not feasible to divide the provider community into competing groups. We examined the demographic features of health markets in the United States to see what proportion of the population lives in areas that might successfully support managed competition.
METHODS: The ratios of physicians to enrollees in large staff-model health maintenance organizations were determined as an indicator of the staffing needs of an efficient health plan. These ratios were used to estimate the populations necessary to support health organizations with various ranges of specialty services. Metropolitan areas with populations large enough to support managed competition were identified.
RESULTS: We estimated that a health care services market with a population of 1.2 million could support three fully independent plans. A population of 360,000 could support three plans that independently provided most acute care hospital services, but the plans would need to share hospital facilities and contract for tertiary services. A population of 180,000 could support three plans that provided primary care and many basic specialty services but that shared inpatient cardiology and urology services. Health markets with populations greater than 180,000 would include 71 percent of the U.S. population; those with populations greater than 360,000, 63 percent; and those with populations greater than 1.2 million, 42 percent.
CONCLUSIONS: Reform of the U.S. health care system through expansion of managed competition is feasible in medium-sized or large metropolitan areas. Smaller metropolitan areas and rural areas would require alternative forms of organization and regulation of health care providers in order to improve quality and economy.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8416437     DOI: 10.1056/nejm199301143280225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  24 in total

1.  Availability of child care in the United States: a description and analysis of data sources.

Authors:  R A Gordon; P L Chase-Lansdale
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2001-05

2.  Immunization coverage and Medicaid managed care in New Mexico: a multimethod assessment.

Authors:  Michael A Schillaci; Howard Waitzkin; E Ann Carson; Cynthia M Lopez; Deborah A Boehm; Leslie A Lopez; Sheila F Mahoney
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Multimethod evaluation of health policy change: an application to Medicaid managed care in a rural state.

Authors:  Howard Waitzkin; Michael Schillaci; Cathleen E Willging
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Integrated delivery systems: has their time come in Canada?

Authors:  P Leatt; G H Pink; C D Naylor
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  The effect of managed care on the incomes of primary care and specialty physicians.

Authors:  C J Simon; D Dranove; W D White
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  General practice fundholding: progress to date.

Authors:  R D Smith; P Wilton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 7.  Economists' perspectives on health care delivery in California as of 1995.

Authors:  S J Singer
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-05

8.  State funding of comprehensive primary medical care service programs for medically underserved populations.

Authors:  S Rosenbaum; D R Hawkins; E Rosenbaum; S Blake
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  The impact of managed care on the physician marketplace.

Authors:  C J Simon; D Dranove; W D White
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

10.  Safety-net institutions buffer the impact of Medicaid managed care: a multi-method assessment in a rural state.

Authors:  Howard Waitzkin; Robert L Williams; John A Bock; Joanne McCloskey; Cathleen Willging; William Wagner
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.