Literature DB >> 8416248

Comparison of regeneration across nerve allografts with temporary or continuous cyclosporin A immunosuppression.

R Midha1, S E Mackinnon, P J Evans, T J Best, G M Hare, D A Hunter, J A Falk-Wade.   

Abstract

The efficacy of short-term immunosuppression in a nerve allograft model was examined by comparing regeneration across peripheral nerve allografts with either temporary (12 weeks) or continuous (30 weeks) cyclosporin A treatment. One-hundred fifty Lewis rats received 2-cm nerve grafts from allogeneic ACI or syngeneic Lewis rat donors and were allocated to the following groups: allogeneic grafts and continuous cyclosporin A, with 18 weeks (20 rats) or 30 weeks (20 rats) of survival after graft placement; allogeneic grafts and temporary cyclosporin A, with 12 weeks (10 rats), 18 weeks (20 rats), or 30 weeks (20 rats) of survival; and control rats with allogeneic and syngeneic grafts, no cyclosporin A, with 12, 18, or 30 weeks (10 rats each) of survival. Functional regeneration across the nerve grafts was serially assessed with walking-track analysis. Endpoint evaluations included electrophysiological, histological, and morphometric studies. Both walking-track and electrophysiological function reached a plateau at a significantly worse level in nonimmunosuppressed allograft recipients than in syngeneic or treated allograft recipients. The group with temporary therapy experienced significant worsening in both motor and electrophysiological function at Week 18, 6 weeks after cyclosporin A withdrawal, compared to the group with continuous treatment. At Week 30, motor and electrophysiological function in the temporary-treatment group recovered to levels similar to those of the syngeneic and continuous cyclosporin A groups. Histological assessment of the graft segments from the temporary cyclosporin A group at 18 weeks showed evidence of rejection, with mononuclear cell infiltration and demyelination; morphometric evaluation demonstrated significantly decreased numbers of nerve fibers in the distal host segment. These histological and morphometric changes were no longer present in the nerves from the temporarily immunosuppressed rats at Week 30. Withdrawal of immunosuppression after successful regeneration through nerve allografts results in short-term graft rejection. Eventual restoration of graft histological and function parameters is comparable to continuously immunosuppressed rats. Temporary immunosuppression of nerve allograft recipients is feasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8416248     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1993.78.1.0090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  12 in total

1.  Dynamic quantification of host Schwann cell migration into peripheral nerve allografts.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Whitlock; Terence M Myckatyn; Alice Y Tong; Andrew Yee; Ying Yan; Christina K Magill; Philip J Johnson; Susan E Mackinnon
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 5.330

2.  Deletion of Calcineurin in Schwann Cells Does Not Affect Developmental Myelination, But Reduces Autophagy and Delays Myelin Clearance after Peripheral Nerve Injury.

Authors:  Chelsey B Reed; Luciana R Frick; Adam Weaver; Mariapaola Sidoli; Elizabeth Schlant; M Laura Feltri; Lawrence Wrabetz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Clinical strategies to enhance nerve regeneration in composite tissue allotransplantation.

Authors:  Simone W Glaus; Philip J Johnson; Susan E Mackinnon
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.907

4.  Localized delivery of immunosuppressive regulatory T cells to peripheral nerve allografts promotes regeneration of branched segmental defects.

Authors:  Kelly C Santos Roballo; Subash Dhungana; Zhongliang Jiang; John Oakey; Jared S Bushman
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Acellular nerve allografts in peripheral nerve regeneration: a comparative study.

Authors:  Amy M Moore; Matthew MacEwan; Katherine B Santosa; Kristofer E Chenard; Wilson Z Ray; Daniel A Hunter; Susan E Mackinnon; Philip J Johnson
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 3.217

6.  An old friendship revisited: plastic surgery and transplantation.

Authors:  B A Shuster; L A Hoffman
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.326

7.  Schwann cells seeded in acellular nerve grafts improve functional recovery.

Authors:  Nithya J Jesuraj; Katherine B Santosa; Matthew R Macewan; Amy M Moore; Rahul Kasukurthi; Wilson Z Ray; Eric R Flagg; Daniel A Hunter; Gregory H Borschel; Philip J Johnson; Susan E Mackinnon; Shelly E Sakiyama-Elbert
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 3.217

8.  Matching of motor-sensory modality in the rodent femoral nerve model shows no enhanced effect on peripheral nerve regeneration.

Authors:  David H Kawamura; Philip J Johnson; Amy M Moore; Christina K Magill; Daniel A Hunter; Wilson Z Ray; Thomas H H Tung; Susan E Mackinnon
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 5.330

9.  Immunohistochemical, ultrastructural and functional analysis of axonal regeneration through peripheral nerve grafts containing Schwann cells expressing BDNF, CNTF or NT3.

Authors:  Maria João Godinho; Lip Teh; Margaret A Pollett; Douglas Goodman; Stuart I Hodgetts; Iain Sweetman; Mark Walters; Joost Verhaagen; Giles W Plant; Alan R Harvey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Repairing peripheral nerve injury using tissue engineering techniques.

Authors:  Ernest W Wang; Jun Zhang; Jason H Huang
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.135

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.