Literature DB >> 8416071

The reliability of ERP components in the auditory oddball paradigm.

S J Segalowitz1, K L Barnes.   

Abstract

Nineteen adolescents (average age 15 years, 3 months) were tested and retested using a standard 40 target, auditory oddball ERP paradigm across an interval of 1 year, 10 months to determine reliability of the ERP components, both in terms of intersubject stability and score agreement and in terms of trait (between-session reliability) versus state (within-session reliability). Significant trait stability was found for the N100, P200, and P300 latencies (r = .48, .51, and .74, respectively), and for P300 amplitude (r = .62), supporting the P300 as a reliable measure, with the stability required for group research but not necessarily for clinical applications. Discussion and examples illustrate the application of reliability information to the planning and evaluation of ERP paradigms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8416071     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb02068.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  29 in total

Review 1.  Cognitive event-related potentials in neuropsychological assessment.

Authors:  I Reinvang
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.444

2.  Event-related brain potential changes after Choto-san administration in stroke patients with mild cognitive impairments.

Authors:  Shuhei Yamaguchi; Miwa Matsubara; Shotai Kobayashi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Reliability of early cortical auditory gamma-band responses.

Authors:  Mackenzie C Cervenka; Piotr J Franaszczuk; Nathan E Crone; Bo Hong; Brian S Caffo; Paras Bhatt; Frederick A Lenz; Dana Boatman-Reich
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Towards a unified model of event-related potentials as phases of stimulus-to-response processing.

Authors:  Brittany K Taylor; William J Gavin; Kevin J Grimm; Mark A Prince; Mei-Heng Lin; Patricia L Davies
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Cortical evoked response to gaps in noise: within-channel and across-channel conditions.

Authors:  Jennifer J Lister; Nathan D Maxfield; Gabriel J Pitt
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 6.  Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b.

Authors:  John Polich
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Rectal tone and brain information processing in irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  S Blomhoff; S Spetalen; M B Jacobsen; M Vatn; U F Malt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  How many trials does it take to get a significant ERP effect? It depends.

Authors:  Megan A Boudewyn; Steven J Luck; Jaclyn L Farrens; Emily S Kappenman
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  The effect of panic disorder versus anxiety sensitivity on event-related potentials during anticipation of threat.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Stevens; Anna Weinberg; Brady D Nelson; Emily E E Meissel; Stewart A Shankman
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2017-12-15

10.  One-year developmental stability and covariance among oddball, novelty, go/no-go, and flanker event-related potentials in adolescence: A monozygotic twin study.

Authors:  Scott J Burwell; Stephen M Malone; William G Iacono
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.