Literature DB >> 8414898

Parameters affecting gap detection in the rat.

D S Leitner1, G R Hammond, C P Springer, K M Ingham, A M Mekilo, P R Bodison, M T Aranda, M A Shawaryn.   

Abstract

The present research used a startle amplitude reduction paradigm to investigate the ability of the rat's auditory system to track rapidly changing acoustic transients. Specifically examined was the ability of brief gaps in otherwise continuous noise to reduce the amplitude of a subsequently elicited acoustic startle reflex. The duration of the gap, time between gap offset and startle elicitation (the interstimulus interval or ISI), and rise-fall characteristics of the gap were systematically varied. Consistent with previous research, gaps reliably reduced startle amplitude. Gaps 2 msec long were reliably detected, and a 50-msec ISI resulted in the greatest amplitude reduction. Gaps presented at short ISIs produced amplitude reduction that followed a different time course than did gaps presented at longer ISIs. These results may reflect differences in the length of time available for the processing of the stimulus and may involve two different processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8414898     DOI: 10.3758/bf03205275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  23 in total

1.  Detection of partially filled gaps in noise and the temporal modulation transfer function.

Authors:  T G Forrest; D M Green
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory fusion: a critical interval test with implications in differential diagnosis.

Authors:  E Trinder
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1979-11

3.  Reflex modification in the domain of startle: II. The anomalous history of a robust and ubiquitous phenomenon.

Authors:  J R Ison; H S Hoffman
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Tracking a temporal gap in band-limited noise: frequency and level effects.

Authors:  P J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-05

5.  Reflex modification in the domain of startle: I. Some empirical findings and their implications for how the nervous system processes sensory input.

Authors:  H S Hoffman; J R Ison
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  The neural substrate of the startle response.

Authors:  D S Leitner; A S Powers; H S Hoffman
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1980-08

7.  Modification of the rat's acoustic startle response by antecedent visual stimulation.

Authors:  G M Schwartz; H S Hoffman; C L Stitt; R R Marsh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1976-01

8.  A primary acoustic startle circuit: lesion and stimulation studies.

Authors:  M Davis; D S Gendelman; M D Tischler; P M Gendelman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Auditory fusion in children.

Authors:  S M Davis; R L McCroskey
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1980-03

10.  Hearing loss in the developmentally handicapped: a comparison of three audiometric procedures.

Authors:  R A Benham-Dunster; J R Dunster
Journal:  J Aud Res       Date:  1985-07
View more
  11 in total

1.  Encoding of temporal features of auditory stimuli in the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body and superior paraolivary nucleus of the rat.

Authors:  A Kadner; A S Berrebi
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  An acoustic startle-based method of assessing frequency discrimination in mice.

Authors:  Amanda Clause; Tuan Nguyen; Karl Kandler
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  A Gap in Time: Extending our Knowledge of Temporal Processing Deficits in the HIV-1 Transgenic Rat.

Authors:  Kristen A McLaurin; Landhing M Moran; Hailong Li; Rosemarie M Booze; Charles F Mactutus
Journal:  J Neuroimmune Pharmacol       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Addressing variability in the acoustic startle reflex for accurate gap detection assessment.

Authors:  Ryan J Longenecker; Inga Kristaponyte; Gregg L Nelson; Jesse W Young; Alexander V Galazyuk
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 5.  Use of a modified prepulse inhibition paradigm to assess complex auditory discrimination in rodents.

Authors:  R Holly Fitch; Steven W Threlkeld; Melissa M McClure; Ann M Peiffer
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  A novel behavioural approach to detecting tinnitus in the guinea pig.

Authors:  Joel I Berger; Ben Coomber; Trevor M Shackleton; Alan R Palmer; Mark N Wallace
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Auditory gap-in-noise detection behavior in ferrets and humans.

Authors:  Joshua R Gold; Fernando R Nodal; Fabian Peters; Andrew J King; Victoria M Bajo
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Temporal resolution ability in students with dyslexia and reading and writing disorders.

Authors:  Juliana Chaubet; Liliane Pereira; Ana Paula Perez
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-06

9.  Progression of temporal processing deficits in the HIV-1 transgenic rat.

Authors:  Kristen A McLaurin; Rosemarie M Booze; Charles F Mactutus
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Neural changes accompanying tinnitus following unilateral acoustic trauma in the guinea pig.

Authors:  Ben Coomber; Joel I Berger; Victoria L Kowalkowski; Trevor M Shackleton; Alan R Palmer; Mark N Wallace
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 3.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.