Literature DB >> 8414896

The effect of tempo and tone duration on rhythm discrimination.

S Handel1.   

Abstract

Rhythm constancy was investigated in two experiments. In Experiment 1, the first rhythm was presented at one tempo, the second rhythm was presented at a different tempo, and subjects judged whether the relative timing structures were identical (i.e., was the first rhythm merely sped up or slowed down to generate the second rhythm?). For the nonmetric rhythms used here, subjects perceived the rhythm in terms of the figural grouping of the tones, and rhythm constancy broke down between slower and faster tempos. In Experiment 2, the first rhythm was presented in tones of one duration; the second rhythm was presented in tones of a different duration; and subjects judged whether the timing structures of the tone onsets were identical (the two rhythms were presented at the same tempo). These results indicated a high degree of constancy; subjects found it easy to discriminate the timing structures. These results confirm that the onset timing is critical to rhythm perception and suggest that rhythm perception at slower rates (2 elements/sec) differs from rhythm perception at faster rates (3-4 elements/sec).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8414896     DOI: 10.3758/bf03205273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  9 in total

1.  The differentiation of rhythmic structure.

Authors:  S Handel
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-11

2.  Operationism and the concept of perception.

Authors:  W R GARNER; H W HAKE; C W ERIKSEN
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1956-05       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Precision and accuracy in the reproduction of simple tone sequences.

Authors:  P G Vos; H H Ellermann
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Effect of time compression and expansion on the discrimination of tonal patterns.

Authors:  R D Sorkin; D A Montgomery
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Mental representations for musical meter.

Authors:  C Palmer; C L Krumhansl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Studies in auditory timing: 2. Rhythm patterns.

Authors:  C B Monahan; I J Hirsh
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-03

7.  Studies in auditory timing: 1. Simple patterns.

Authors:  I J Hirsh; C B Monahan; K W Grant; P G Singh
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-03

8.  Perceiving melodic and rhythmic auditory patterns.

Authors:  S Handel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1974-11

9.  The contextual nature of rhythmic interpretation.

Authors:  S Handel; G R Lawson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-08
  9 in total
  7 in total

1.  Preattentive auditory context effects.

Authors:  István Winkler; Elyse Sussman; Mari Tervaniemi; János Horváth; Walter Ritter; Risto Näätänen
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  The effects of metronomic pendular adjustment versus tap-tempo input on the stability and accuracy of tempo perception.

Authors:  Warren Brodsky
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2005-01-13

3.  The detection of anisochrony in monaural and interaural sound sequences.

Authors:  G ten Hoopen; L Boelaarts; A Gruisen; I Apon; K Donders; N Mul; S Akerboom
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-07

4.  Relative priming of temporal local--global levels in auditory hierarchical stimuli.

Authors:  Alexandra List; Timothy Justus
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Perceptual Plasticity for Auditory Object Recognition.

Authors:  Shannon L M Heald; Stephen C Van Hedger; Howard C Nusbaum
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-23

6.  Alarm tones, music and their elements: Analysis of reported waking sounds to counteract sleep inertia.

Authors:  Stuart J McFarlane; Jair E Garcia; Darrin S Verhagen; Adrian G Dyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Syncopation and the score.

Authors:  Chunyang Song; Andrew J R Simpson; Christopher A Harte; Marcus T Pearce; Mark B Sandler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.