Literature DB >> 8414860

Safety and efficacy of a topical anesthetic for neonatal circumcision.

K B Weatherstone1, L B Rasmussen, A Erenberg, E M Jackson, K S Claflin, R D Leff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Circumcision is a common neonatal surgical procedure routinely performed without the use of anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of topical lidocaine cream as an anesthetic for circumcision.
METHODS: Thirty newborns were studied in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study; 15 received a topical 30% lidocaine cream and 15 received the cream base alone. Vital signs were recorded, and preoperative and postoperative serum beta-endorphin and lidocaine concentrations were measured. A videotape of the newborn was used to score behavioral changes.
RESULTS: Comparisons of the vital signs precircumcision and postcircumcision showed no differences between the placebo and treatment groups, with the exception of mean systolic blood pressure, which significantly increased in the placebo-treated newborns (P < .05). Serum beta-endorphin concentrations increased postoperatively in 11 of 15 subjects receiving placebo, but decreased or remained unchanged in 10 of 15 subjects receiving lidocaine (P = .03, Fisher's exact test). When stress-related behaviors in the precircumcision and post-circumcision periods were compared, the mean increase in their occurrence was greater in the placebo than in the treatment group. There was no significant absorption of lidocaine as measured in the serum.
CONCLUSION: Topical application of a 30% lidocaine cream as used in this study may be a safe and efficacious anesthetic for circumcision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8414860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  8 in total

Review 1.  Pain management for neonatal circumcision.

Authors:  A Taddio
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 2.  Topical anaesthesia for needle-related pain in newborn infants.

Authors:  Jann P Foster; Christine Taylor; Kaye Spence
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-04

Review 3.  A risk-benefit assessment of topical percutaneous local anaesthetics in children.

Authors:  S C Russell; E Doyle
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Neonatal male circumcision after delisting in Ontario. Survey of new parents.

Authors:  R E Walton; T Ostbye; M K Campbell
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Lignocaine ointment and local anaesthesia in preterm infants.

Authors:  D P Barker; N Rutter
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 6.  Neonatal circumcision revisited. Fetus and Newborn Committee, Canadian Paediatric Society.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Meatotomy using topical anesthesia: A painless option.

Authors:  Vinod Priyadarshi; Anurag Puri; Jitendra Pratap Singh; Shwetank Mishra; Dilip Kumar Pal; Anup Kumar Kundu
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

Review 8.  Pain relief for neonatal circumcision.

Authors:  B Brady-Fryer; N Wiebe; J A Lander
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004-10-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.