Literature DB >> 8414316

The accuracy of endometrial Pipelle sampling with and without sonographic measurement of endometrial thickness.

R Goldchmit1, Z Katz, I Blickstein, B Caspi, R Dgani.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of Pipelle endometrial sampling with and without sonographic measurement of endometrial thickness.
METHODS: We studied prospectively 176 consecutive patients (23% after and 77% before menopause) scheduled for D&C. Sonographic measurement of the endometrium and endometrial biopsy with the Pipelle were performed before the curettage.
RESULTS: In 159 cases (90%), the endometrial histologic results of curettage agreed with those of the Pipelle biopsy. All three cases of endometrial cancer were identified by Pipelle aspiration. In seven cases (4%), the Pipelle aspiration failed to detect hyperplasia. Sonographic endometrial thickness of more than 5 mm slightly increased the sensitivity and slightly decreased the specificity of Pipelle aspiration from 82 to 92% and from 99 to 96%, respectively. In postmenopausal patients admitted for bleeding, the sensitivity and specificity reached 100%.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that normal Pipelle aspirates in premenopausal patients with abnormal uterine bleeding are highly accurate. In postmenopausal patients with sonographic endometrial thickness of 5 mm or less, the accuracy reached 100%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8414316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  9 in total

1.  Practice tips. Endometrial biopsy.

Authors:  M Greiver
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Who needs an endometrial biopsy?

Authors:  Sheri-Lee Samson; Donna Gilmour
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  A new diagnostic test for endometrial cancer?: Cytology analysis of sonohysterography distention media.

Authors:  Onur Guralp; Susan M Sheridan; Josephine Harter; James Louis Hinshaw; Songwon Seo; Ellen M Hartenbach; Steven Lindheim; Sarah Stewart; David M Kushner
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 4.  The demise of the D&C.

Authors:  C J Seamark
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Endometrial sampling and general practice.

Authors:  M Shapley; C W Redman
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 6.  Endometrial cancer. Prevention, detection, management, and follow up.

Authors:  L Elit
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Effect of hormone replacement therapy on postmenopausal endometrial bleeding.

Authors:  Zoltan Magyar; Eniko Berkes; Zsolt Csapo; Zoltan Papp
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2007-12-25       Impact factor: 3.201

8.  Endometrial sampling in low-risk patients with abnormal uterine bleeding: a systematic review and meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Brenda F Narice; Brigitte Delaney; Jon M Dickson
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 9.  Bias associated with delayed verification in test accuracy studies: accuracy of tests for endometrial hyperplasia may be much higher than we think!

Authors:  T Justin Clark; Gerben ter Riet; Aravinthan Coomarasamy; Khalid S Khan
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2004-05-11       Impact factor: 8.775

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.