Literature DB >> 8412047

The effect of various recovery modalities on subsequent performance, in consecutive supramaximal exercise.

P Thiriet1, D Gozal, D Wouassi, T Oumarou, H Gelas, J R Lacour.   

Abstract

Different recovery strategies from maximal exercise seem to induce different lactate utilization patterns without significantly affecting performance on one subsequent maximal exercise. It remains unclear however, how varying recovery modalities affects repeated maximal exercise. To study this, we examined in 16 subjects, the influence of passive (P), active leg (L) and active arm (A) twenty minutes recovery periods separating a series of four exhaustive exercises, up to two minutes duration. Significant decreases in performance between the first and fourth exercise were observed in all recovery series but a significant decrease in performance in the second exercise was observed during passive recovery alone (p < 0.01). When the different types of recovery are compared, a more pronounced decrement in performance was found during passive recovery when first and last exercises are compared (p < 0.04). Pedaling duration in each successive exercise was unaffected in A or L but was significantly shorter in P (p < 0.03). Highly significant differences in mean blood lactate kinetics were found for the three recovery patterns used, with more elevated peak and nadir levels in passive recovery, intermediate values in active arm and lowest concentrations in active leg recovery. However, no correlation was found between performance and lactate concentration at the onset of exercise (r = -0.15; p = NS). Mean heart rates were similar throughout the experimental protocol except for a lower cardiac frequency during the last 5 minutes of passive recovery (p < 0.01). Blood hematocrits showed higher hemoconcentrations in repeated exercise during passive recovery (p < 0.01) despite significantly lower total fluid losses in this group. A significant correlation between peak hematocrit and blood lactate was also found (r = 0.67; p < 0.001). We conclude that the type of recovery has a significant effect on blood lactate elimination kinetics, and active recovery is beneficial in the preservation of performance during repeated maximal exercise. Furthermore, plasma shifts across the extra and intravascular spaces are induced by maximal exercise, and appear to closely follow blood lactate kinetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8412047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness        ISSN: 0022-4707            Impact factor:   1.637


  14 in total

1.  The physiological effects of low-intensity neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on short-term recovery from supra-maximal exercise bouts in male triathletes.

Authors:  J K Malone; G F Coughlan; L Crowe; G C Gissane; B Caulfield
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Relationship between oxygen uptake kinetics and performance in repeated running sprints.

Authors:  Grégory Dupont; Grégoire P Millet; Comlavi Guinhouya; Serge Berthoin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Using recovery modalities between training sessions in elite athletes: does it help?

Authors:  Anthony Barnett
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Comparison of active and electrostimulated recovery strategies after fatiguing exercise.

Authors:  Marc Vanderthommen; Souleyma Makrof; Christophe Demoulin
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Effects of recovery type after a judo match on blood lactate and performance in specific and non-specific judo tasks.

Authors:  Emerson Franchini; Rômulo Cássio de Moraes Bertuzzi; Monica Yuri Takito; Maria A P D M Kiss
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Effects of recovery mode (active vs. passive) on performance during a short high-intensity interval training program: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Abderraouf Ben Abderrahman; Hassane Zouhal; Karim Chamari; Delphine Thevenet; Pierre-Yves de Mullenheim; Steven Gastinger; Zouhair Tabka; Jacques Prioux
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Comparison of recovery strategies on maximal force-generating capacity and electromyographic activity level of the knee extensor muscles.

Authors:  Nidhal Zarrouk; Haithem Rebai; Abdelmoneem Yahia; Nizar Souissi; François Hug; Mohamed Dogui
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 8.  Physiological response to water immersion: a method for sport recovery?

Authors:  Ian M Wilcock; John B Cronin; Wayne A Hing
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Effects of active versus passive recovery on power output during repeated bouts of short term, high intensity exercise.

Authors:  Declan Aj Connolly; Kevin M Brennan; Christie D Lauzon
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

10.  Hyperoxia during recovery from consecutive anaerobic exercises in the sickle cell trait.

Authors:  P Thiriet; D Wouassi; E Bitanga; J R Lacour; D Gozal
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1995
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.