Literature DB >> 8411054

Impact of genetic counselling after neonatal screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

E Hildes1, H K Jacobs, A Cameron, S S Seshia, F Booth, J A Evans, K Wrogemann, C R Greenberg.   

Abstract

In a pilot neonatal screening programme for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) conducted in the Canadian province of Manitoba, a cohort of eight affected males was identified between 1 January 1986 and 31 December 1989. Demographic information, knowledge of DMD, reproductive outcome, and attitudes to prenatal diagnosis and neonatal screening for DMD were obtained through questionnaires distributed in May 1992 to the eight sets of parents of index cases, two high probability carrier aunts, and one high probability carrier sister. Personal interviews were subsequently conducted in the summer of 1992. Although there is overall consensus among the families in favour of routine neonatal screening for DMD, five of seven subsequent pregnancies reported in six women were not monitored by prenatal diagnosis and have resulted in the birth of two affected boys. In a comparable time interval, prenatal diagnosis was acceptable to carrier females whose affected male relatives were traditionally diagnosed at four or five years. We conclude that, although molecular genetic analysis now allows for precise diagnosis of DMD, highly accurate carrier testing and prenatal diagnosis, very early DMD carrier identification, and genetic counselling after the identification of DMD males in a population based neonatal screening programme may not be an effective way of decreasing the number of repeat cases of DMD within families or the overall population frequency of DMD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8411054      PMCID: PMC1016496          DOI: 10.1136/jmg.30.8.670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Genet        ISSN: 0022-2593            Impact factor:   6.318


  5 in total

1.  Attitudes toward the prenatal diagnosis of cystic fibrosis: factors in decision making among affected families.

Authors:  D C Wertz; S R Janes; J M Rosenfield; R W Erbe
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Gene studies in newborn males with Duchenne muscular dystrophy detected by neonatal screening.

Authors:  C R Greenberg; M Rohringer; H K Jacobs; N Averill; E Nylen; G J van Ommen; K Wrogemann
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-08-20       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  [Systematic neonatal detection of Duchenne's muscular dystrophy. Results after 10 years' of experience in Lyons (France)].

Authors:  H Plauchu; M P Cordier; H N Carrier; C Dellamonica; C Dorche; P Guibaud; B Lauras; J Cotte; J M Robert
Journal:  J Genet Hum       Date:  1987-08

4.  Population screening for fragile X.

Authors:  G Turner; H Robinson; S Laing; M van den Berk; A Colley; A Goddard; S Sherman; M Partington
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-05-16       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Three years' experience with neonatal screening for Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy: gene analysis, gene expression, and phenotype prediction.

Authors:  C R Greenberg; H K Jacobs; W Halliday; K Wrogemann
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1991-04-01
  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Reproductive patterns among mothers of males diagnosed with Duchenne or Becker muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Sarah K Nabukera; Paul A Romitti; Kristin M Caspers; Natalie Street; Christopher Cunniff; Katherine D Mathews; Deborah J Fox; Soman Puzhankara; Emma Ciafaloni; Katherine A James; Yin Su
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 2.802

2.  Newborn screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a psychosocial study.

Authors:  E P Parsons; A J Clarke; K Hood; E Lycett; D M Bradley
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  Expectations and values about expanded newborn screening: a public engagement study.

Authors:  Robin Z Hayeems; Fiona A Miller; Yvonne Bombard; Denise Avard; June Carroll; Brenda Wilson; Julian Little; Pranesh Chakraborty; Jessica Bytautas; Yves Giguere; Judith Allanson; Renata Axler
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  An urgent need for a change in policy revealed by a study on prenatal testing for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Apollonia T J M Helderman-van den Enden; Kamlesh Madan; Martijn H Breuning; Annemieke H van der Hout; Egbert Bakker; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Hendrika B Ginjaar
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 4.246

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.