Literature DB >> 8410924

Comparison of the effects of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and a calcium antagonist in hypertensive, macroproteinuric diabetic patients: a randomised double-blind study.

M J O'Donnell1, B R Rowe, N Lawson, A Horton, O H Gyde, A H Barnett.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the effects of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, lisinopril, with those of a calcium blocker, nifedipine, on BP control and renal function, in a prospective randomised double-blind, double-dummy trial lasting 19 weeks in patients with diabetic nephropathy. We enrolled 28 diabetic patients with hypertension and macroproteinuria from the out-patient diabetic-renal clinic. The antihypertensive treatment consisted of lisinopril or nifedipine, and their effect on arterial BP, urinary albumin excretion, glomerular filtration rate, and renal blood flow were measured. BPs at entry were 166/99 (SD 23/9) mmHg for the lisinopril group and 165/99(21/7) mmHg for the nifedipine group. BPs fell to 143/88 (17/13) mmHg for the lisinopril group and 148/85(25/10) mmHg for the nifedipine group at the end of the study. The albumin excretion rate fell in the lisinopril group from 738.7 (635.2) micrograms/min to 644.6 (965.2) micrograms/min and rose in the nifedipine group from 981.2 (1022.2) micrograms/min to 1072.5 (908.5) micrograms/min (P = NS). Glomerular filtration rates fell from 105.2 (57.5) ml/min per 1.73 m2 to 72.1 (39.4) ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the lisinopril group and from 109.9 (50.0) ml/min per 1.73 m2 to 82.9 (53.9) ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the nifedipine treated group. Renal blood flow fell from 446.8 (217.9) ml/min per 1.73 m2 to 435.1 (243.3) ml/min per 1.73 m2 for the lisinopril group and from 473.0 (216.4) ml/min per 1.73 m2 to 419.0 (278.6) ml/min per 1.73 m2 for the nifedipine group. Differences between the groups were not significant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8410924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  8 in total

Review 1.  Lisinopril. A review of its pharmacology and use in the management of the complications of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  K L Goa; M Haria; M I Wilde
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers and renal disease.

Authors:  Nicolás R Robles; Francesco Fici; Guido Grassi
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.872

Review 3.  Renal protection and antihypertensive drugs: current status.

Authors:  A Salvetti; P Mattei; I Sudano
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Renoprotective role of ACE inhibitors in diabetic nephropathy.

Authors:  C E Mogensen
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1994-09

Review 5.  The diabetic patient with hypertension.

Authors:  G P Leese; M W Savage; P D Chattington; J P Vora
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 6.  Lisinopril. A review of its pharmacology and clinical efficacy in elderly patients.

Authors:  H D Langtry; A Markham
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  The case for combining angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium-channel blockers.

Authors:  A A Taylor; S Sunthornyothin
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.369

8.  Clinical implications of the change in glomerular filtration rate with adrenergic blockers in patients with morning hypertension: the Japan morning surge-1 study.

Authors:  Seiichi Shibasaki; Kazuo Eguchi; Yoshio Matsui; Kazuyuki Shimada; Kazuomi Kario
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 2.420

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.