Literature DB >> 8410398

Patient preferences: survival vs quality-of-life considerations.

D J Mazur1, D H Hickman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether patients can weigh risk comparisons involving mortality and quality of life in an understandable manner based on their willingness to accept risks of complications.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of patients.
SETTING: University-based Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center. PARTICIPANTS: 230 men patients seen in a general medicine clinic. MEASUREMENTS: Two survival graphs were used. Each graph contained survival curves for two alternative unidentified treatments for an unidentified medical condition. Graph 2 contained one curve that had a life expectancy that was 14% higher than the life expectancy of the corresponding curve in graph 1. Respondents were randomly assigned one of the two graphs and were asked to indicate which treatment they preferred and what risk of a change in their quality of life (urinary incontinence or importance) they were willing to accept to achieve longer survival. Patients were also asked whether they had a history of urinary incontinence or impotence. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: Patients tended to be unwilling to accept worse quality of life to achieve increased survival over time. For both curve comparisons, significantly more (p < 0.01) patients accepted a treatment associated with higher mortality to avoid a 100% chance of incontinence than to avoid a 100% chance of impotence. Of the 75% (172/230) of patients reporting willingness to accept risk of either urinary incontinence or total impotence or both, 62% reported having at least some symptoms related to urinary incontinence or impotence. Of the 58 patients not willing to accept the complication risks, only 11% reported a history of urinary incontinence or impotence. The results show that patients are able to make distinctions about severity of morbidity, men are less willing to accept the risk of urinary incontinence than that of total impotence, and men patients who are symptomatic with urinary incontinence or impotence are more willing to accept the risks of treatment than are asymptomatic patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8410398     DOI: 10.1007/bf02600076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  9 in total

1.  The expansion of liability for medical accidents: from negligence to strict liability by way of informed consent.

Authors:  Alan Meisel
Journal:  Neb Law Rev       Date:  1977

2.  Interpretation of graphic data by patients in a general medicine clinic.

Authors:  D J Mazur; D H Hickam
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Why the goals of informed consent are not realized: treatise on informed consent for the primary care physician.

Authors:  D J Mazur
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs.

Authors:  G W Torrance; W H Thomas; D L Sackett
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies.

Authors:  B J McNeil; S G Pauker; H C Sox; A Tversky
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  The utility of different health states as perceived by the general public.

Authors:  D L Sackett; G W Torrance
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1978

7.  Eliciting preferences for alternative drug therapies in oncology: influence of treatment outcome description, elicitation technique and treatment experience on preferences.

Authors:  A M O'Connor; N F Boyd; P Warde; L Stolbach; J E Till
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

8.  Sex or survival: trade-offs between quality and quantity of life.

Authors:  P A Singer; E S Tasch; C Stocking; S Rubin; M Siegler; R Weichselbaum
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  External beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer clinically confined to the gland.

Authors:  G E Hanks
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.649

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Quality of life bibliography and indexes: 1993 update.

Authors:  R A Berzon; G P Simeon; R L Simpson; M A Donnelly; H H Tilson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  iChoose Kidney: A Clinical Decision Aid for Kidney Transplantation Versus Dialysis Treatment.

Authors:  Rachel E Patzer; Mohua Basu; Christian P Larsen; Stephen O Pastan; Sumit Mohan; Michael Patzer; Michael Konomos; William M McClellan; Janice Lea; David Howard; Jennifer Gander; Kimberly Jacob Arriola
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Patient preferences for management of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  D J Mazur; D H Hickam
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug

Review 4.  The Bionic Radiologist: avoiding blurry pictures and providing greater insights.

Authors:  Marc Dewey; Uta Wilkens
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2019-07-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.