Literature DB >> 8409988

Bone-grafting for acetabular deficiency during primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. A radiographic and clinical analysis.

J L Knight1, K Fujii, R Atwater, L Grothaus.   

Abstract

The use of bone-graft to augment the deficient acetabulum in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is controversial. To identify factors affecting cup loosening in patients who received a bone-graft during THA, two orthopaedic surgeons retrospectively examined sequential radiographs. The surgeons also obtained independent computer measurements of hip center and cup abduction migration from preoperative, initial, and latest postoperative radiographs. Variables studied included host factors, graft factors, and technique factors. All conclusions were based on Kaplan-Meier log-rank analysis to account for differing lengths of follow-up periods among the cases. The authors report a series of 74 consecutive cases with a minimum 24-month follow-up period (mean, 40 months). All grafts appeared to unite. The clinicians found 80% stable cups, 8% possibly loose cups, and 12% (n = 9) definitely loose cups. In retrospect, technical errors were seen in six loose cups. Five revisions for loosening (6.7% of cases) were performed. Computer measurement found cup loosening in a higher percentage of cases than detected by the clinicians and did so an average of 18 months sooner. Acetabular cup loosening was associated with the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons type III defects, use of allograft versus autograft, and initial cup abduction of 50 degrees or more. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis found 31% of cups radiographically loose and 15% revised at 5 years or more since surgery. Acetabular bone-grafting is technically demanding and should be employed when alternative reconstructions will not give a durable result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8409988     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(06)80035-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  12 in total

1.  The survival and fate of acetabular reconstruction with impaction grafting for large defects.

Authors:  Eduardo Garcia-Cimbrelo; Ana Cruz-Pardos; Eduardo Garcia-Rey; José Ortega-Chamarro
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Custom Acetabular Cages Offer Stable Fixation and Improved Hip Scores for Revision THA With Severe Bone Defects.

Authors:  Huiwu Li; Xinhua Qu; Yuanqing Mao; Kerong Dai; Zhenan Zhu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Total hip replacement with solid autologous femoral head graft for hip dysplasia.

Authors:  B Hintermann; E W Morscher
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Reliability of the acetabular reconstruction technique using autogenous bone graft from resected femoral head in hip dysplasia: Influence of the change of hip joint center on clinical outcome.

Authors:  Joo Ho Song; Tae Soo Ahn; Pil Whan Yoon; Jae Suk Chang
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-08-01

5.  High long-term survival of bulk femoral head autograft for acetabular reconstruction in cementless THA for developmental hip dysplasia.

Authors:  Mitsunari Kim; Toru Kadowaki
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Long-term results of acetabular reconstruction using three bulk bone graft techniques in cemented total hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia.

Authors:  Kenichi Oe; Hirokazu Iida; Hiroshi Kawamura; Narumi Ueda; Tomohisa Nakamura; Naofumi Okamoto; Yusuke Ueda
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Reconstruction of the Shallow Acetabulum With a Combination of Autologous Bulk and Impaction Bone Grafting Fixed by Cement.

Authors:  Masaaki Maruyama; Shinji Wakabayashi; Hiroshi Ota; Keiji Tensho
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Arterial embolism due to massive cement leakage during total hip arthroplasty revision.

Authors:  Yusuke Kazama; Yasuhiko Takegami; Yusuke Osawa; Kazuya Makida; Taisuke Seki
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.131

Review 9.  Cellular Mechanisms Responsible for Success and Failure of Bone Substitute Materials.

Authors:  Tim Rolvien; Mike Barbeck; Sabine Wenisch; Michael Amling; Matthias Krause
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-09-23       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  A novel, multi-level approach to assess allograft incorporation in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tim Rolvien; Christian Friesecke; Sebastian Butscheidt; Thorsten Gehrke; Michael Hahn; Klaus Püschel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.