Literature DB >> 8408936

Epidemiological impact of prolonged systematic use of topical SDD on bacterial colonization of the tracheobronchial tree and antibiotic resistance. A three year study.

G Nardi1, U Valentinis, A Proietti, A De Monte, A Di Silvestre, R Muzzi, R Peressutti, M G Troncon, F Giordano.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the effect of the prolonged systematic use of topical SDD (tobramycin 80 mg, polymyxin E 100 mg, amphotericin B 500 mg) on ICU ecology as expressed by changes in tracheal colonization and bacterial resistances.
DESIGN: Prospective microbiological survey.
SETTING: Polyvalent ICU of a 2000 beds general hospital. PATIENTS: Data concerning bacterial strains isolated from the tracheo-bronchial aspirates of all the patients admitted to a polyvalent ICU over 3 consecutive periods of 12 months ('88, '89, '90) were prospectively entered in a database and subsequently analyzed. During a 3-year period 502 patients required artificial ventilation for more than 72 h and 332 of them ('89 and '90) were treated with SDD. All samples collected within 72 h from ICU admission were excluded as well as duplicate samples from the same patients. INTERVENTION: All the patients admitted to the ICU in '89 and '90 and submitted to artificial ventilation for at least 24 h were routinely treated with topical SDD without i.v. antibiotic prophylaxis; in '88 SDD was not employed. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: Criteria for collecting sputum samples and microbiological procedures remained unchanged throughout the study-time. Positive sputum were significantly less in '89 (80.8% versus 92.3% p < 0.001) and this was due to a very sharp decrease in the isolation of Gram-negative strains from 43-28% (-64% p < 0.0001) involving both: Enterobacteriaceae (-45%) and Pseudomonaceae (-77%). In 1990; however, a new increase in Gram negative was observed, although the overall amount of Gram-negative was still 49% lower in '90 if compared to '88 (p < 0.0001). A dramatic increase in Pseudomonas isolation was the only factor responsible for the "rebound" observed. An increasing percentage of Pseudomonas developed a resistance towards tobramycin and only 45% of Pseudomonas strains turned out to be sensible to tobramycin in '90 against 79% in '88. A similar trend was registered for all aminoglycosides with the exception of amikacin. Gram-positive colonizations tended to increase (+63%) (p < 0.0001) and this was mainly due to Coagulase negative Staphylococci (+290% p < 0.0001) and S. pneumoniae, whereas S. aureus isolations decreased (-18%) but not significantly.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the prolonged use of SDD is associated with dramatic changes in ICU ecology: the incidence of Gram negative colonization is significantly diminished by SDD whereas Gram positive tend to increase. Pseudomonas developed an increasing resistance towards tobramycin one of the components of the SDD formula we used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8408936     DOI: 10.1007/bf01690547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  26 in total

1.  Pilot trial of selective decontamination for prevention of bacterial infection in an intensive care unit.

Authors:  J Flaherty; C Nathan; S A Kabins; R A Weinstein
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  Influence of cefotaxime on microbial colonization resistance in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  E J Vollaard; H A Clasener; A J Janssen; H J Wynne
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Evaluation of clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa for ribosomal resistance to tobramycin.

Authors:  P Botha; M J de Kock; C J van Vuuren; S Fourie; C van Heerden
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  1990-09-01

4.  Short-term parenteral antibiotics used as a supplement to SDD regimens.

Authors:  S R Alcock
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 5.  Selective decontamination in intensive care practice: a review of clinical experience.

Authors:  G Ramsay; J J Reidy
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  [The effect of selective decontamination on nosocomial infections, their causative agents and antibiotic resistance in long-term intubated intensive care patients].

Authors:  M Sydow; H Burchardi; T A Crozier; R Rüchel; C Busse; W C Seyde
Journal:  Anasth Intensivther Notfallmed       Date:  1990-12

7.  Microscopic and bacteriological comparison of paired sputa and transtracheal aspirates.

Authors:  R W Geckler; D H Gremillion; C K McAllister; C Ellenbogen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Triple regimen of selective decontamination of the digestive tract, systemic cefotaxime, and microbiological surveillance for prevention of acquired infection in intensive care.

Authors:  I M Ledingham; S R Alcock; A T Eastaway; J C McDonald; I C McKay; G Ramsay
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-04-09       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Prevention of colonization and respiratory infections in long-term ventilated patients by local antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Authors:  K Unertl; G Ruckdeschel; H K Selbmann; U Jensen; H Forst; F P Lenhart; K Peter
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Prevention of colonization and infection in critically ill patients: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  A J Kerver; J H Rommes; E A Mevissen-Verhage; P F Hulstaert; A Vos; J Verhoef; P Wittebol
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Prevention of nosocomial bacterial pneumonia.

Authors:  J L Vincent
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 2.  The relationship between gut-derived bacteria and the development of the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome.

Authors:  G A Nieuwenhuijzen; E A Deitch; R J Goris
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Reply to "selective digestive tract decontamination and spread of colistin resistance: antibiotic prophylaxis is not a substitute for hygiene".

Authors:  Teysir Halaby; Nashwan Al Naiemi; Christina M J E Vandenbroucke-Grauls
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Cost effectiveness of selective decontamination of the digestive tract in liver transplant patients.

Authors:  P J van Enckevort; J H Zwaveling; J T Bottema; J K Maring; I J Klompmaker; M J Slooff; E M TenVergert
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Impact of SDD on ICU ecology.

Authors:  H K van Saene; S R Alcock; J H Rommes; D Baxby; A Percival
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Selective decontamination of the digestive tract. Benefit remains unproved.

Authors:  M J Bonten; C A Gaillard; S van der Geest
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-12-11

7.  The perfidious effect of topical placebo: calibration of Staphylococcus aureus ventilator-associated pneumonia incidence within selective digestive decontamination studies versus the broader evidence base.

Authors:  James C Hurley
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Management of antimicrobial use in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  F Alvarez-Lerma; M Palomar; S Grau
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Unusually High Incidences of Staphylococcus aureus Infection within Studies of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia Prevention Using Topical Antibiotics: Benchmarking the Evidence Base.

Authors:  James C Hurley
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2018-01-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.