Literature DB >> 8408773

Retinotopic organization of the primary visual cortex of flying foxes (Pteropus poliocephalus and Pteropus scapulatus).

M G Rosa1, L M Schmid, L A Krubitzer, J D Pettigrew.   

Abstract

The representation of the visual field in the occipital cortex was studied by multiunit recordings in seven flying foxes (Pteropus spp.), anesthetized with thiopentone/N2O and immobilized with pancuronium bromide. On the basis of its visuotopic organization and architecture, the primary visual area (V1) was distinguished from neighboring areas. Area V1 occupies the dorsal surface of the occipital pole, as well as most of the tentorial surface of the cortex, the posterior third of the mesial surface of the brain, and the upper bank of the posterior portion of the splenial sulcus. In each hemisphere, it contains a precise, visuotopically organized representation of the entire extent of the contralateral visual hemifield. The representation of the vertical meridian, together with 8-15 degrees of ipsilateral hemifield, forms the anterior border of V1 with other visually responsive areas. The representation of the horizontal meridian runs anterolateral to posteromedial, dividing V1 so that the lower visual quadrant is represented medially, and the upper quadrant laterally. The total surface area of V1 is about 140 mm2 for P. poliocephalus, and 110 mm2 for P. scapulatus. The representation of the central visual field is greatly magnified relative to that of the periphery. The cortical magnification factor decreases with increasing eccentricity, following a negative power function. Conversely, receptive field sizes increase markedly with increasing eccentricity, and therefore the point-image size is approximately constant throughout V1. The emphasis in the representation of the area centralis in V1 is much larger than that expected on the basis of ganglion cell counts in flat-mounted retinas. Thus, a larger degree of convergence occurs at the peripheral representations in the retino-geniculo-cortical pathway, in comparison with the central representations. The marked emphasis in the representation of central vision, the wide extent of the binocular field of vision, and the relatively large surface area of V1 reflect the importance of vision in megachiropterans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8408773     DOI: 10.1002/cne.903350105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Neurol        ISSN: 0021-9967            Impact factor:   3.215


  7 in total

Review 1.  Brain maps, great and small: lessons from comparative studies of primate visual cortical organization.

Authors:  Marcello G P Rosa; Rowan Tweedale
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Visual responses of neurones in the second visual area of flying foxes (Pteropus poliocephalus) after lesions of striate cortex.

Authors:  A P Funk; M G Rosa
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  The marmoset monkey as a model for visual neuroscience.

Authors:  Jude F Mitchell; David A Leopold
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.304

4.  Magnification factors, receptive field images and point-image size in the superior colliculus of flying foxes: comparison with the primary visual cortex.

Authors:  M G Rosa; L M Schmid
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Visual responses of neurons in the middle temporal area of new world monkeys after lesions of striate cortex.

Authors:  M G Rosa; R Tweedale; G N Elston
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The optic chiasm: a turning point in the evolution of eye/hand coordination.

Authors:  Matz Larsson
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 7.  Origins of Functional Organization in the Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Michael Ibbotson; Young Jun Jung
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.