Literature DB >> 8408723

Measures of treatment efficacy.

P P Hujoel1, D A Baab, T A DeRouen.   

Abstract

Measures of treatment efficacy are those numbers we think about when we decide whether one treatment is "better" than another. Such measures quantify the differences between treatments and help patients and clinicians make informed choices. The usual measure of treatment efficacy in periodontal research has been the mean difference between treatments in probing level measures. This measure has frustrated clinicians and researchers alike for its failure to communicate the size of the association between treatment and clinical outcome. How does one interpret the clinical relevance of a small mean difference between treatments, such as 0.4 mm? This report compares the advantages and disadvantages of the different measures of treatment efficacy: the mean difference, the relative risk, significance levels (P-values), the risk difference, and, the preventable fraction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8408723     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1993.tb00778.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Periodontol        ISSN: 0303-6979            Impact factor:   8.728


  2 in total

1.  Interpretation of treatment effects in periodontal research: a note on the number needed to treat.

Authors:  Julie A Stoner; Jeffrey B Payne
Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.316

2.  Subantimicrobial dose doxycycline effects on alveolar bone loss in post-menopausal women.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Payne; Julie A Stoner; Pirkka V Nummikoski; Richard A Reinhardt; Arthur D Goren; Mark S Wolff; Hsi-Ming Lee; James C Lynch; Robert Valente; Lorne M Golub
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 8.728

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.