Literature DB >> 8408089

Joint moments and muscle activity in the lower extremities and lower back in lifting and lowering tasks.

M P de Looze1, H M Toussaint, J H van Dieën, H C Kemper.   

Abstract

The mechanical loading on the body during the act of lifting has been estimated frequently. The opposite act of lowering has received much less attention. The aim of the present study was to compare the mechanical loading of the musculoskeletal system in lifting and lowering. Eight subjects repetitively lifted and lowered a load, using two different techniques (a leg and a back technique). The ankle, knee, hip and lumbosacral joint moments were estimated and the myoelectrical (EMG) activity of seven (leg and back) muscles was recorded. The differences between the lifting and lowering phase for the leg technique were similar to those observed when the back technique was applied. The joint moment curves in lifting showed a high level of agreement with the (time-reversed) moment curves in lowering. Peak moments in lowering were only slightly lower than in lifting (peak lumbar moments were 5.4% lower). These small differences were related to different acceleration profiles at the centre of gravity of the body/load complex. The EMG activity was considerably lower in lowering than in lifting. The mean EMG in lowering (average for seven muscles) was only about 69% of the EMG in lifting. This was attributed to the different types of muscle actions involved in lifting (mainly concentric) and lowering (mainly eccentric). Furthermore, the EMG results suggest that similar inter-muscular coordination is involved in lowering and lifting. The results give rise to the assumption that in lifting and lowering similar muscle forces are produced to meet the (nearly) equal joint moments, but in lowering these forces are distributed over a smaller cross-sectional area of active muscle, which might imply a higher risk of injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8408089     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(05)80006-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  12 in total

1.  Biomechanical comparison of isokinetic lifting and free lifting when applied to chronic low back pain rehabilitation.

Authors:  S Bouilland; P Loslever; F X Lepoutre
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Mechanical demands on the lower back in patients with non-chronic low back pain during a symmetric lowering and lifting task.

Authors:  Iman Shojaei; Elizabeth G Salt; Quenten Hooker; Babak Bazrgari
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Age-related differences in maintenance of balance during forward reach to the floor.

Authors:  Manuel E Hernandez; James A Ashton-Miller; Neil B Alexander
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 6.053

4.  An ergonomic comparison of rowing machine designs: possible implications for safety.

Authors:  I A Bernstein; O Webber; R Woledge
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  Changes in intra-abdominal pressure, trunk muscle activation and force during isokinetic lifting and lowering.

Authors:  A G Cresswell; A Thorstensson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1994

6.  Influence of lifting technique on perceptual and cardiovascular responses to submaximal repetitive lifting.

Authors:  K B Hagen; K Harms-Ringdahl; J Hallén
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1994

7.  Breath control during manual free-style lifting of a maximally tolerated load.

Authors:  Eric M Lamberg; Marshall Hagins
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Neuromuscular Evaluation of Trunk-Training Exercises.

Authors:  Peter Konrad; Klaus Schmitz; Achim Denner
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Task-dependent inhibition of slow-twitch soleus and excitation of fast-twitch gastrocnemius do not require high movement speed and velocity-dependent sensory feedback.

Authors:  Ricky Mehta; Boris I Prilutsky
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Motor-Evoked Potentials in the Lower Back Are Modulated by Visual Perception of Lifted Weight.

Authors:  Frank Behrendt; Marc H E de Lussanet; Karen Zentgraf; Volker R Zschorlich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.