PURPOSE: To compare the prognostic factors and survivals of black and white patients with endometrial carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective study was undertaken of a total of 290 patients with endometrial carcinoma who were treated similarly at the Health Science Center at Brooklyn and Kings County Hospital Center from 1975 and 1990. One hundred and thirty-six of 290 (47.2%) were black and 135/290 (46.9%) were white. Well-known prognostic factors affecting endometrial carcinoma were studied in black and white group of patients. Their overall survival and comparison of survival in each prognostic group were also estimated using multi-variate analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-four percent of white patients had Stage I disease, compared to 45.9% in black patients. In Stage II, 51.6% were white and 48.4% were black, and in Stage III, 88.89% were black and 11.1% were white patients (p = 0.034). Fifty six percent Grade 1 patients were white and 44% were black. In Grade 2, 53.3% were white and 46.7% were black and in Grade 3 disease, 70.5% were black and 29.5% were white (p = 0.008). Up to the inner third of myometrial invasion had occurred in 60.6% of white patients and 39.4% in black patients. The middle third of the myometrium was invaded in 60.7% of white patients, and 39.3% of black patients. Thirty-seven percent of outer third of myometrial invasion was found in white patients and 63% in black patients (p = 0.038). Seventy-two percent of positive lymph nodes were found in black patients and 28.0% in white patients (p = 0.01). Sixty-one percent of patients with positive peritoneal cytology were black as compared to 38.7% in white patients (p = 0.017). The overall ten-year corrected survival for white and black patients was 72% and 40%, respectively (p = 0.0003). Survivals comparisons, when stratified by race and each prognostic group, showed statistically significant overall survival differences in favor of white patients. CONCLUSION: Black patients with endometrial carcinoma have poor survival. Low socio-economic status (SES) would not explain these findings. More research is required to determine the cause of poor survival in black patients with endometrial carcinoma.
PURPOSE: To compare the prognostic factors and survivals of black and white patients with endometrial carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective study was undertaken of a total of 290 patients with endometrial carcinoma who were treated similarly at the Health Science Center at Brooklyn and Kings County Hospital Center from 1975 and 1990. One hundred and thirty-six of 290 (47.2%) were black and 135/290 (46.9%) were white. Well-known prognostic factors affecting endometrial carcinoma were studied in black and white group of patients. Their overall survival and comparison of survival in each prognostic group were also estimated using multi-variate analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-four percent of white patients had Stage I disease, compared to 45.9% in black patients. In Stage II, 51.6% were white and 48.4% were black, and in Stage III, 88.89% were black and 11.1% were white patients (p = 0.034). Fifty six percent Grade 1 patients were white and 44% were black. In Grade 2, 53.3% were white and 46.7% were black and in Grade 3 disease, 70.5% were black and 29.5% were white (p = 0.008). Up to the inner third of myometrial invasion had occurred in 60.6% of white patients and 39.4% in black patients. The middle third of the myometrium was invaded in 60.7% of white patients, and 39.3% of black patients. Thirty-seven percent of outer third of myometrial invasion was found in white patients and 63% in black patients (p = 0.038). Seventy-two percent of positive lymph nodes were found in black patients and 28.0% in white patients (p = 0.01). Sixty-one percent of patients with positive peritoneal cytology were black as compared to 38.7% in white patients (p = 0.017). The overall ten-year corrected survival for white and black patients was 72% and 40%, respectively (p = 0.0003). Survivals comparisons, when stratified by race and each prognostic group, showed statistically significant overall survival differences in favor of white patients. CONCLUSION: Black patients with endometrial carcinoma have poor survival. Low socio-economic status (SES) would not explain these findings. More research is required to determine the cause of poor survival in black patients with endometrial carcinoma.
Authors: Christopher M Tarney; Chunqiao Tian; Guisong Wang; Elizabeth A Dubil; Nicholas W Bateman; John K Chan; Mohamed A Elshaikh; Michele L Cote; Joellen M Schildkraut; Craig D Shriver; Thomas P Conrads; Chad A Hamilton; G Larry Maxwell; Kathleen M Darcy Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2017-08-08 Impact factor: 5.482