Literature DB >> 8407259

Accuracy of computed tomography during arterial portography in the segmental localization of liver tumours.

R F McLoughlin1, M Barry, R G Gibney, O Traynor, J F Griffin, D P MacErlean.   

Abstract

The ability of computed tomography during arterial portography (CTAP) to identify and segmentally locate 20 hepatic tumours was prospectively assessed in 7 patients undergoing hepatic resection. All eight lesions greater than 2.5 cm in diameter were detected, but only two out of four and two out of eight of those measuring 1-2.4 cm and < 1 cm respectively. The overall segmental localization accuracy for detected lesions was 91%. Our results highlight the insensitivity of CTAP to hepatic lesions smaller than 1 cm in size, but have shown the accuracy of segmental localization for detected lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8407259     DOI: 10.1007/bf02945199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  5 in total

Review 1.  Surgical decision making for large bowel cancer metastatic to the liver.

Authors:  P H Sugarbaker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Work in progress: dynamic sequential computed tomography during arterial portography in the detection of hepatic neoplasms.

Authors:  O Matsui; M Kadoya; M Suzuki; K Inoue; H Itoh; M Ida; T Takashima
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Preoperative localization of focal liver lesions to specific liver segments: utility of CT during arterial portography.

Authors:  R C Nelson; J L Chezmar; P H Sugarbaker; D R Murray; M E Bernardino
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Hepatic tumors: comparison of CT during arterial portography, delayed CT, and MR imaging for preoperative evaluation.

Authors:  R C Nelson; J L Chezmar; P H Sugarbaker; M E Bernardino
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Hepatic metastasis detection: comparison of three CT contrast enhancement methods.

Authors:  D L Miller; J T Simmons; R Chang; B A Ward; T H Shawker; J L Doppman; A E Chang
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 11.105

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.