BACKGROUND: A noninvasive technique of pressure measurement in esophageal varices using an endoscopic balloon has been shown to be reliable in vitro. In the present study, this method was tested in vivo. METHODS: Thirty-seven pressure measurements in esophageal varices were performed in 34 patients by two independent operators (A and B) using an endoscopic balloon and compared with measurements performed by needle puncture by a third operator (C). RESULTS: Three measurements performed with the endoscopic balloon were rejected because they were noninterpretable. Measurements performed by A and B correlated well (correlation coefficient, 0.90); interobserver variability (r) was 0.88. Of 37 punctures performed for pressure measurements, 4 resulted in bleeding and 8 measurements were rejected as uninterpretable. Regression analysis showed a good correlation between the needle puncture and balloon techniques for pressure measurements performed by both operators (y = 5.3 + 1.0x, r = 0.8; y = 6.2 + 0.9x, r = 0.8), and analysis of variability showed a measurement bias of -5.3 +/- 4.1 and -4.1 +/- 3.5 cm H2O. No significant difference in variceal size measured with the endoscopic balloon or endoscopic forceps was found. CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic balloon allows measurement of pressure in esophageal varices without hazard to the patient; in addition, it may be used to assess the varix size.
BACKGROUND: A noninvasive technique of pressure measurement in esophageal varices using an endoscopic balloon has been shown to be reliable in vitro. In the present study, this method was tested in vivo. METHODS: Thirty-seven pressure measurements in esophageal varices were performed in 34 patients by two independent operators (A and B) using an endoscopic balloon and compared with measurements performed by needle puncture by a third operator (C). RESULTS: Three measurements performed with the endoscopic balloon were rejected because they were noninterpretable. Measurements performed by A and B correlated well (correlation coefficient, 0.90); interobserver variability (r) was 0.88. Of 37 punctures performed for pressure measurements, 4 resulted in bleeding and 8 measurements were rejected as uninterpretable. Regression analysis showed a good correlation between the needle puncture and balloon techniques for pressure measurements performed by both operators (y = 5.3 + 1.0x, r = 0.8; y = 6.2 + 0.9x, r = 0.8), and analysis of variability showed a measurement bias of -5.3 +/- 4.1 and -4.1 +/- 3.5 cm H2O. No significant difference in variceal size measured with the endoscopic balloon or endoscopic forceps was found. CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic balloon allows measurement of pressure in esophageal varices without hazard to the patient; in addition, it may be used to assess the varix size.