Literature DB >> 8405707

Cytoplasmic islet cell antibodies recognize distinct islet antigens in IDDM but not in stiff man syndrome.

W Richter1, J Seissler, W Northemann, S Wolfahrt, H M Meinck, W A Scherbaum.   

Abstract

Cytoplasmic islet cell antibodies are well-established predictive markers of IDDM. Although target molecules of ICA have been suggested to be gangliosides, human monoclonal ICA of the immunoglobulin G class (MICA 1-6) produced from a patient with newly diagnosed IDDM recognized glutamate decarboxylase as a target antigen. Here we analyzed the possible heterogeneity of target antigens of ICA by subtracting the GAD-specific ICA staining from total ICA staining of sera. This was achieved 1) by preabsorption of ICA+ sera with recombinant GAD65 and/or GAD67 expressed in a baculovirus system and 2) by ICA analysis of sera on mouse pancreas, as GAD antibodies do not stain mouse islets in the immunofluorescence test. We show that 24 of 25 sera from newly diagnosed patients with IDDM recognize islet antigens besides GAD. In contrast, GAD was the only islet antigen recognized by ICA from 7 sera from patients with stiff man syndrome. Two of these sera, however, recognized antigens besides GAD in Purkinje cells. In patients with IDDM, non-GAD ICA were diverse. One group, found in 64% of the sera, stained human and mouse islets, whereas the other group of non-GAD ICA was human specific. Therefore, mouse islets distinguish two groups of non-GAD ICA and lack additional target epitopes of ICA besides GAD. Longitudinal analysis of 6 sera from nondiabetic ICA+ individuals revealed that mouse-reactive ICA may appear closer to clinical onset of IDDM in some individuals. Mouse-reactive ICAs, however, remained absent in 36% of the patients at diagnosis of IDDM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8405707     DOI: 10.2337/diab.42.11.1642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes        ISSN: 0012-1797            Impact factor:   9.461


  6 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of epitope recognition of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) by autoantibodies from different autoimmune disorders.

Authors:  A C Powers; K Bavik; J Tremble; K Daw; W A Scherbaum; J P Banga
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 2.  Prediction and prevention of type I diabetes.

Authors:  R Gianani; G S Eisenbarth
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Impact of Age and Antibody Type on Progression From Single to Multiple Autoantibodies in Type 1 Diabetes Relatives.

Authors:  Emanuele Bosi; David C Boulware; Dorothy J Becker; Jane H Buckner; Susan Geyer; Peter A Gottlieb; Courtney Henderson; Amanda Kinderman; Jay M Sosenko; Andrea K Steck; Polly J Bingley
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Association between HLA and islet cell antibodies in diabetic patients with a mitochondrial DNA mutation at base pair 3243.

Authors:  T Kobayashi; Y Oka; H Katagiri; A Falorni; A Kasuga; I Takei; K Nakanishi; T Murase; K Kosaka; A Lernmark
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 10.122

5.  Long latency between GAD-antibody detection and development of limbic encephalitis--a case report.

Authors:  Susanne Fauser; Ingo Uttner; Helena Ariño; Werner A Scherbaum; Albert Saiz; Jan Lewerenz
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.474

6.  Higher autoantibody levels and recognition of a linear NH2-terminal epitope in the autoantigen GAD65, distinguish stiff-man syndrome from insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  J Kim; M Namchuk; T Bugawan; Q Fu; M Jaffe; Y Shi; H J Aanstoot; C W Turck; H Erlich; V Lennon; S Baekkeskov
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1994-08-01       Impact factor: 14.307

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.