OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between the type and duration of diabetes and pancreas size by ultrasonography. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Pancreas images of 40 IDDM and 36 NIDDM patients with 0.3-34 yr of disease were compared with those of 60 normal healthy control subjects. RESULTS: The diameters +/- SD of the head, body, and tail of the pancreas in IDDM patients (1.9 +/- 0.3; 0.9 +/- 0.2; and 1.4 +/- 0.2 cm, respectively) were smaller than in NIDDM patients (2.7 +/- 0.4; 1.2 +/- 0.3; and 1.8 +/- 0.4 cm, respectively) and control group subjects (2.4 +/- 0.4; 1.1 +/- 0.3; and 1.8 +/- 0.4 cm, respectively). The pancreatic shrinkage in IDDM patients was clearly evident after 10 yr of the disease. NIDDM patients and control subjects had similar pancreatic dimensions, except for a greater body thickness in NIDDM patients with > 10 yr of disease (1.2 +/- 0.4 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.3 cm). These results were not related to differences in age, sex, and body size. Pancreas image was hypoechogenic in 72.5% of IDDM patients and hyperechogenic in 83.3% of NIDDM patients. CONCLUSIONS: Smaller pancreases in IDDM patients in comparison with NIDDM patients and control subjects were clearly demonstrated only after 10 yr of disease. Patients with NIDDM were not affected by pancreatic dimensions, except for a greater body thickness after 10 yr of disease. Pancreatic echogenicity increased with age.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between the type and duration of diabetes and pancreas size by ultrasonography. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Pancreas images of 40 IDDM and 36 NIDDMpatients with 0.3-34 yr of disease were compared with those of 60 normal healthy control subjects. RESULTS: The diameters +/- SD of the head, body, and tail of the pancreas in IDDMpatients (1.9 +/- 0.3; 0.9 +/- 0.2; and 1.4 +/- 0.2 cm, respectively) were smaller than in NIDDMpatients (2.7 +/- 0.4; 1.2 +/- 0.3; and 1.8 +/- 0.4 cm, respectively) and control group subjects (2.4 +/- 0.4; 1.1 +/- 0.3; and 1.8 +/- 0.4 cm, respectively). The pancreatic shrinkage in IDDMpatients was clearly evident after 10 yr of the disease. NIDDMpatients and control subjects had similar pancreatic dimensions, except for a greater body thickness in NIDDMpatients with > 10 yr of disease (1.2 +/- 0.4 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.3 cm). These results were not related to differences in age, sex, and body size. Pancreas image was hypoechogenic in 72.5% of IDDMpatients and hyperechogenic in 83.3% of NIDDMpatients. CONCLUSIONS: Smaller pancreases in IDDMpatients in comparison with NIDDMpatients and control subjects were clearly demonstrated only after 10 yr of disease. Patients with NIDDM were not affected by pancreatic dimensions, except for a greater body thickness after 10 yr of disease. Pancreatic echogenicity increased with age.
Authors: David C Dallas; Megan R Sanctuary; Yunyao Qu; Shabnam Haghighat Khajavi; Alexandria E Van Zandt; Melissa Dyandra; Steven A Frese; Daniela Barile; J Bruce German Journal: Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr Date: 2017-10-13 Impact factor: 11.176
Authors: Marc D Normandin; Kitt F Petersen; Yu-Shin Ding; Shu-Fei Lin; Sarita Naik; Krista Fowles; Daniel M Skovronsky; Kevan C Herold; Timothy J McCarthy; Roberto A Calle; Richard E Carson; Judith L Treadway; Gary W Cline Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2012-05-09 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Temel Tirkes; Zarine K Shah; Naoki Takahashi; Joseph R Grajo; Stephanie T Chang; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Darwin L Conwell; Evan L Fogel; Walter Park; Mark Topazian; Dhiraj Yadav; Anil K Dasyam Journal: Radiology Date: 2018-10-16 Impact factor: 29.146
Authors: Steven E Kahn; Yi-Chun Chen; Nathalie Esser; Austin J Taylor; Daniël H van Raalte; Sakeneh Zraika; C Bruce Verchere Journal: Endocr Rev Date: 2021-09-28 Impact factor: 25.261