Literature DB >> 8404099

Comparison of snoring measured at home and during polysomnographic studies.

F Sériès1, I Marc, L Atton.   

Abstract

Snoring characteristics depend on several factors (sleep position, sleep architecture, breathing route) that can be influenced by changes in sleep habits and by the presence of the different probes and electrodes during polysomnographic studies. Our objective in this study was to compare the characteristics of snoring in the home environment with those of the sleep laboratory where most conventional studies are carried out. Fourteen nonapneic snorers were subjected to three night recording sessions within a two-week period, two at home and one in the sleep laboratory. To eliminate any sleep interference by the apparatus, breathing sounds were recorded with two microphones symmetrically placed on either side of the bed, the signal being preamplified and stored on a VHS hi-fi video recorder. The recorded signal was analyzed by using a spectrum analyzer (real time analyzer) and an equalizer to correct for acoustic resonances of the bedrooms. A snoring event was defined as a breathing sound with a sound pressure level (SPL) greater than 60 dB SPL. The snoring index (number/sleep hour) and the sound intensity of each event were automatically determined. The total sleep time (TST) was similar for the two home recordings (6.8 +/- 0.2 and 7.0 +/- 0.2 h, respectively, mean +/- SEM), but it was significantly shorter during the hospital study (6.0 +/- 0.3 h). The snoring indices obtained at home were 141.4 +/- 33.3 and 144.1 +/- 41.2/h and not statistically different from those obtained during the hospital recording (209.1 +/- 41.5/h). The percentage of TST spent above 60 dB SPL was significantly greater during the polysomnographic study (4.3 +/- 1.2 percent) than during the home recordings (2.5 +/- 0.7 and 2.9 +/- 1.0 percent, respectively). We conclude that the severity of snoring may be overestimated during polysomnographic recordings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8404099     DOI: 10.1378/chest.103.6.1769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  7 in total

1.  Effects of continuous positive airway pressure on upper airway inspiratory dynamics in awake patients with sleep-disordered breathing.

Authors:  E Vérin; T Similowski; F Sériès
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  The annoyance of snoring and psychoacoustic parameters: a step towards an objective measurement.

Authors:  Christian Rohrmeier; Michael Herzog; Frank Haubner; Thomas S Kuehnel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Calculating annoyance: an option to proof efficacy in ENT treatment of snoring?

Authors:  René Fischer; Thomas S Kuehnel; Anne-Kathrin Merz; Tobias Ettl; Michael Herzog; Christian Rohrmeier
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Changes in snoring characteristics after 30 days of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in patients with non-apnoeic snoring: a controlled trial.

Authors:  F Sériès; I Marc
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 9.139

5.  Nasal pressure recording in the diagnosis of sleep apnoea hypopnoea syndrome.

Authors:  F Sériès; I Marc
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Automatic detection of whole night snoring events using non-contact microphone.

Authors:  Eliran Dafna; Ariel Tarasiuk; Yaniv Zigel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Are annoyance scores based on sound pressure levels suitable for snoring assessment in the home environment?

Authors:  René Fischer; Franziska Unverdorben; Thomas S Kuehnel; Veronika Vielsmeier; Gerrit Spanier; Steven C Marcrum; Christian Rohrmeier
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.816

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.