Literature DB >> 8403834

From rote learning to system building: acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets.

K Plunkett1, V Marchman.   

Abstract

The traditional account of the acquisition of English verb morphology supposes that a dual architecture underlies the transition from early rote-learning processes (in which past tense forms of verbs are correctly produced) to the systematic treatment of verbs (in which irregular verbs are prone to error). A connectionist account supposes that this transition can occur in a single mechanism (in the form of a neural network) driven by gradual quantitative changes in the size of the training set to which the network is exposed. In this paper, a series of simulations is reported in which a multi-layered perceptron learns to map verb stems to past tense forms analogous to the mappings found in the English past tense system. By expanding the training set in a gradual, incremental fashion and evaluating network performance on both trained and novel verbs at successive points in learning, it is demonstrated that the network undergoes reorganizations that result in a shift from a mode of rote learning to a systematic treatment of verbs. Furthermore, we show that this reorganizational transition is dependent upon the number of regular and irregular verbs in the training set and is sensitive to the phonological sub-regularities characterizing the irregular verbs. The pattern of errors observed is compared to that of children acquiring the English past tense, as well as children's performance on experimental studies with nonsense verbs. It is concluded that a connectionist approach offers a viable alternative account of the acquisition of English verb morphology, given the current state of empirical evidence relating to processes of acquisition in young children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8403834     DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90057-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  36 in total

Review 1.  The declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grammar.

Authors:  M T Ullman
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2001-01

2.  Can connectionist models of phonology assembly account for phonology?

Authors:  I Berent
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

3.  Imaging the past: neural activation in frontal and temporal regions during regular and irregular past-tense processing.

Authors:  Marc F Joanisse; Mark S Seidenberg
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 4.  The mirror brain, concepts, and language: the price of anthropogenesis.

Authors:  T V Chernigovskaya
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-03

5.  Grammatical Abilities in Young Cochlear Implant Recipients and Children With Normal Hearing Matched by Vocabulary Size.

Authors:  Jongmin Jung; David J Ertmer
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  Limitations on reliability: regularity rules in the English plural and past tense.

Authors:  Vikram K Jaswal; David A McKercher; Mieke Vanderborght
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2008 May-Jun

7.  Memory and learning for a novel written style.

Authors:  J Zervakis; D C Rubin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-07

8.  Processing of English inflectional morphology.

Authors:  J A Sereno; A Jongman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-07

9.  Knowing more than one can say: the early regular plural.

Authors:  Jennifer A Zapf; Linda B Smith
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2009-02-23

10.  A cross-linguistic and bilingual evaluation of the interdependence between lexical and grammatical domains.

Authors:  Gabriela Simon-Cereijido; Vera F Gutiérrez-Clellen
Journal:  Appl Psycholinguist       Date:  2009
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.