Literature DB >> 8402802

In situ anticariogenic potential of glass ionomer cement.

E M Benelli1, M C Serra, A L Rodrigues, J A Cury.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the amount of fluoride in plaque formed on glass ionomer cement or composite and to evaluate the effects of fluoride released on growth of cariogenic microflora, fluoride uptake, and secondary caries formation under in situ conditions of a high cariogenic challenge. Ten adult volunteers took part in this crossover study performed in two phases of 28 days. Eighty enamel blocks were randomly restored with glass ionomer cement (Chelon-Fil-Espe) or composite (Silux). During each phase of the study, an acrylic resin appliance, containing four enamel blocks restored with the same material, was constructed for each of the volunteers. During the experimental period, all subjects used fluoride-free dentifrice, refrained from brushing the restored enamel blocks, and immersed the appliances into 20% sucrose solution eight times a day. Fluoride levels, mutans streptococci, and lactobacilli were assessed in dental plaque. Fluoride uptake and microhardness profiles were determined in enamel around the restorations. Statistical analyses indicated a significantly higher level of fluoride (p < 0.05) and a lower level of mutans streptococci plaque formed on glass ionomer cement. Analysis of variance in a split-plot model indicated that in the enamel around the glass ionomer restoration the fluoride uptake was significantly greater (p < 0.025) and the mineral loss significantly lower (p < 0.01). The results show that glass ionomer cement presents a broad anticariogenic effect and may be of value in preventing secondary caries, even under conditions of a high caries risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8402802     DOI: 10.1159/000261551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Caries Res        ISSN: 0008-6568            Impact factor:   4.056


  18 in total

1.  ART class II restoration loss in primary molars: re-restoration or not?

Authors:  C P J M Boon; N L Visser; A M Kemoli; W E van Amerongen
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2010-10

2.  Modification of resin modified glass ionomer cement by addition of bioactive glass nanoparticles.

Authors:  Alireza Valanezhad; Tetsuro Odatsu; Koichi Udoh; Takanobu Shiraishi; Takashi Sawase; Ikuya Watanabe
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Glass ionomer cement inhibits secondary caries in an in vitro biofilm model.

Authors:  Norbert Krämer; Miriam Schmidt; Susanne Lücker; Eugen Domann; Roland Frankenberger
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Effect of CO2 laser on root caries inhibition around composite restorations: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Jociana Bandeira de Melo; Fernando Seishim Hanashiro; Washington Steagall; Miriam Lacalle Turbino; Marinês Nobre-dos-Santos; Michel Nicolau Youssef; Wanessa Christine de Souza-Zaroni
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Effect of Er:YAG laser on enamel demineralization around restorations.

Authors:  Vivian Colucci; Aline Evangelista de Souza Gabriel; Renata Siqueira Scatolin; Mônica Campos Serra; Silmara Aparecida Milori Corona
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 3.161

6.  Secondary Caries in situ Models: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Audrey C C Hollanders; Nicolien K Kuper; Tamires T Maske; Marie-Charlotte D N J M Huysmans
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Influence of microleakage, surface roughness and biofilm control on secondary caries formation around composite resin restorations: an in situ evaluation.

Authors:  Fábio Garcia Lima; Ana Regina Romano; Marcos Britto Correa; Flávio Fernando Demarco
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

8.  Microleakage after Thermocycling of Three Self-Etch Adhesives under Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Restorations.

Authors:  Sabine O Geerts; Laurence Seidel; Adelin I Albert; Audrey M Gueders
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2010-06-06

9.  Strength and fluoride release characteristics of a calcium fluoride based dental nanocomposite.

Authors:  Hockin H K Xu; Jennifer L Moreau; Limin Sun; Laurence C Chow
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Ion release from, and fluoride recharge of a composite with a fluoride-containing bioactive glass.

Authors:  Harry B Davis; Fernanda Gwinner; John C Mitchell; Jack L Ferracane
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 5.304

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.