Literature DB >> 8402612

Comparison of loss of heterozygosity patterns in invasive low-grade and high-grade epithelial ovarian carcinomas.

M K Dodson1, L C Hartmann, W A Cliby, K A DeLacey, G L Keeney, S R Ritland, J Q Su, K C Podratz, R B Jenkins.   

Abstract

Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) studies were performed to investigate the genetic differences which separate low-grade (LG), high-grade (HG), and borderline epithelial ovarian carcinomas. Fresh tumor samples and blood were obtained from 58 patients (20 LG, 34 HG, and 4 borderline tumor specimens) undergoing surgery for ovarian carcinoma at Mayo Clinic. Tumors were graded using a modified Broder's classification with invasive grades 1 and 2 considered LG, invasive grades 3 and 4 considered HG, and tumors with no evidence of stromal invasion classified as borderline. Polymorphism analysis was performed using 76 restriction fragment length polymorphisms and variable number of tandem repeats and 59 microsatellite markers representing all chromosome arms. Chromosome arms 6p, 17p, 17q, and 22q were found to be frequently lost in LG as well as HG tumors. Chromosome arms 13q and 15q were lost to a significantly greater extent in HG tumors compared to LG neoplasms (P = 0.003 and P = 0.08, respectively). Conversely, 3p loss was seen more frequently with LG tumors (P = 0.02). The majority of LG tumors (65%) did not show frequent LOH in the allelotype analysis. In fact, a subset of 7 (7 of 20) LG tumors accounted for 76% of the total allelic loss in the LG category. These tumors showed LOH almost identical to that of the HG neoplasms. Borderline tumors showed a low rate of allelic loss. There were no common events found between borderline and invasive tumors. Our data suggest that most HG tumors and a subset of LG tumors share genetic alterations at putative tumor suppressor genes detected by LOH studies. Chromosome 6 and 17 losses appear to be early events while 13q and 15q losses appear to be critical late events. However, a majority of LG tumors appear to develop as a consequence of an alternative mechanism(s) which is not detected by LOH studies. Possibilities include: (a) inactivation of tumor suppressor genes without LOH; (b) dominant negative gene(s) in which only one allele requires mutation; and (c) changes in dominant acting oncogenes. This unidentified phenomenon may be operative in borderline tumors as well.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8402612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  19 in total

1.  Expression profiles of 290 ESTs mapped to chromosome 3 in human epithelial ovarian cancer cell lines using DNA expression oligonucleotide microarrays.

Authors:  Emily N Manderson; Anne-Marie Mes-Masson; Jaroslav Novak; Peter D Lee; Diane Provencher; Thomas J Hudson; Patricia N Tonin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 2.  FOXP3 as an X-linked tumor suppressor.

Authors:  Lizhong Wang; Runhua Liu; Mark Ribick; Pan Zheng; Yang Liu
Journal:  Discov Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.970

3.  Molecular signatures of X chromosome inactivation and associations with clinical outcomes in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Stacey J Winham; Nicholas B Larson; Sebastian M Armasu; Zachary C Fogarty; Melissa C Larson; Brian M McCauley; Chen Wang; Kate Lawrenson; Simon Gayther; Julie M Cunningham; Brooke L Fridley; Ellen L Goode
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 4.  Microenvironment and pathogenesis of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Antonio F Saad; Wei Hu; Anil K Sood
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.869

Review 5.  Gene dysregulations driven by somatic copy number aberrations-biological and clinical implications in colon tumors: a paper from the 2009 William Beaumont Hospital Symposium on Molecular Pathology.

Authors:  Manny D Bacolod; Francis Barany
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 5.568

6.  Diverse tumorigenic pathways in ovarian serous carcinoma.

Authors:  Gad Singer; Robert J Kurman; Hsueh-Wei Chang; Sarah K R Cho; Ie-Ming Shih
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.307

7.  Gross genomic alterations differ between serous borderline tumors and serous adenocarcinomas--an image cytometric DNA ploidy analysis of 307 cases with histogenetic implications.

Authors:  Manohar Pradhan; Ben Davidson; Claes Göran Tropé; Håvard Emil Danielsen; Vera Maria Abeler; Björn Risberg
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  An allelotype analysis indicating the presence of two distinct ovarian clear-cell carcinogenic pathways: endometriosis-associated pathway vs. clear-cell adenofibroma-associated pathway.

Authors:  Sohei Yamamoto; Hitoshi Tsuda; Kozue Suzuki; Masashi Takano; Seiichi Tamai; Osamu Matsubara
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  Molecular evidence for putative tumour suppressor genes on chromosome 13q specific to BRCA1 related ovarian and fallopian tube cancer.

Authors:  A P M Jongsma; J M J Piek; R P Zweemer; R H M Verheijen; J W T Klein Gebbinck; G J van Kamp; I J Jacobs; P Shaw; P J van Diest; P Kenemans
Journal:  Mol Pathol       Date:  2002-10

10.  Rapid detection of loss of heterozygosity of chromosome 17p by polymerase chain reaction-based variable number of tandem repeat analysis and detection of single-strand conformation polymorphism of intragenic p53 polymorphisms.

Authors:  B Dockhorn-Dworniczak; C Poremba; R Dantcheva; A Stücker; E Brömmelkamp; S Blasius; W Mellin; A Roessner; D W Yandell; W Böcker
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.